From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Gnus generalized search, part II Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:25:15 +0300 Message-ID: <831sskqxb8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zif930mt.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tw5hjnzr.fsf@hanan> <87mvb92er2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83efwkrhj1.fsf@gnu.org> <87inlw32ga.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8337d0qxno.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492874680 7284 195.159.176.226 (22 Apr 2017 15:24:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 15:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eric@ericabrahamsen.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 17:24:35 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1wtn-0001jX-C0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 17:24:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35946 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1wtr-0007Ci-EQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:24:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1wtl-0007Cd-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:24:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1wti-00083w-Pv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1wti-00083s-MH; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4104 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d1wti-0004Ob-28; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:24:30 -0400 In-reply-to: <8337d0qxno.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:17:47 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214216 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:17:47 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Is (accept-process-output 0) the same as (accept-process-output > > nil)? > > Yes. Sorry, I've misread the code. Zero means don't wait at all, even if process output is not available.