From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers, final testing Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 15:29:03 +0300 Message-ID: <831spsmnw0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y3s9pm2a.fsf@gnu.org> <87vandz7lw.fsf@lylat> <83wp7tpcav.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2y1z45o.fsf@lylat> <83vandp7wz.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv8pyy7f.fsf@lylat> <83shigpoxq.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv8nkh31.fsf@lylat> <83bmp3pnmb.fsf@gnu.org> <87eftzju5g.fsf@lylat> <837ezqq3gd.fsf@gnu.org> <874luuyuqy.fsf@lylat> <83wp7po86m.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuecc7vg.fsf@lylat> <83y3s2n5pa.fsf@gnu.org> <878tk1rmjx.fsf@lylat> <83a84gn4z9.fsf@gnu.org> <8360f4mvd4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499430637 6129 195.159.176.226 (7 Jul 2017 12:30:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 12:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: agrambot@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 07 14:30:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dTSOz-00017z-A0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:30:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTSP3-0006GQ-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 08:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTSNs-0006Dv-Ob for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 08:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTSNo-0000CN-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 08:29:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTSNo-0000CE-Nm; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 08:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4396 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dTSNo-000551-0J; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 08:29:16 -0400 In-reply-to: <8360f4mvd4.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:47:35 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216267 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:47:35 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I timed the current implementation at 0.2 msec, in an optimized build; Trying to repeat this for several large buffers, I get much faster performance: 0.04 micro-seconds per call. I guess something was wrong with my original timing. In any case, it's _fast_.