From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 20:38:25 +0300 Message-ID: <831sebjyb2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878t8lfgu3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83o9hfk311.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgcjo736.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526492236 13501 195.159.176.226 (16 May 2018 17:37:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 17:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 19:37:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ0MR-0003QB-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 19:37:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ0OY-0004Ox-IV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 13:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ0Nf-0004Nh-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 13:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ0Nc-0004pp-GT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 13:38:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ0Nc-0004pl-CI; Wed, 16 May 2018 13:38:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1202 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ0NV-0000MX-4Y; Wed, 16 May 2018 13:38:17 -0400 In-reply-to: <87lgcjo736.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Wed, 16 May 2018 19:15:09 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225346 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: rms@gnu.org, oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 19:15:09 +0200 > > On Mai 16 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > E.g., Rmail renders HTML messages, but doesn't access external URL > > references, it creates a button out of each reference that the user > > needs to activate to cause Emacs to fetch the URL. > > There is a difference between anchors that form links to other pages, > and elements like images that are part of the contents, but use external > references (instead of using data that is part of the message). In > order to render the latter the external reference must be fetched. I agree that there's a difference, but a good MUA should treat them the same, and only download images after the user confirms. (And private/secret correspondence shouldn't include such external references in the first place, IMHO.)