From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing native image scaling Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:42:22 +0200 Message-ID: <831s2skvld.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fttpat8p.fsf@gnu.org> <20190119214543.GA13967@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <834la3b9hd.fsf@gnu.org> <838sx0kzw9.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="52375"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 27 19:58:42 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h9Dl2-000DTV-Lt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:58:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52223 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9Dl1-00064q-I0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9DhZ-0003Ge-KC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9DVO-0001e6-Lf; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1931 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h9DVN-0007Ap-N5; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:42:30 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Andy Moreton on Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:35:09 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234789 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:35:09 +0000 > > > It seems to work, but maybe I don't know what and how to check. Can > > you show what I should expect to see with and without the :scale > > attribute, in "emacs -Q"? > > I would expect a sliced image to be composed of a grid of tiled images > instead of a single image, but to have the same visual appearance as the > original image. The w32 code does not get this right. Did insert-sliced-image ever work on Windows, even before scaling was added? > Adding the ":scale 0.5" argument scales down the tiled array of images > correctly, but they still contain the same display artifacts as the > sliced image without scaling. Thanks, but I asked for the _correct_ image I need to expect, because I want something to compare to if/when I decide to try to fix this.