From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Extend gdb to filter registers Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 19:12:33 +0200 Message-ID: <831rrmp2f2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878spmuerf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wod3bx8i.fsf@gnu.org> <9f5ddaa5-0234-a17b-bdd7-81d70a0a50d6@gmx.at> <83FFF194-64CD-409E-8B7A-5A9DF91E79DE@gmail.com> <83v9pb314t.fsf@gnu.org> <838sm510d6.fsf@gnu.org> <83muakzoy5.fsf@gnu.org> <71042c9f-478b-47c8-f27e-1348e9f4536d@gmx.at> <83iml8zkbm.fsf@gnu.org> <6ad85759-7408-f177-38f6-45a72c2f5a9e@gmx.at> <83eevwzi79.fsf@gnu.org> <68ef651e-9319-b392-af1c-4564d5db9112@gmx.at> <831rrvzc81.fsf@gnu.org> <997C9AD2-D8DD-45DC-9195-28FEC907B2C4@gmail.com> <83muajxs04.fsf@gnu.org> <416593FF-C4BE-478F-B5AC-3379235146ED@gmail.com> <83lfq3xp66.fsf@gnu.org> <679953AF-F50A-4ABE-B836-150BA0F95DAE@gmail.com> <83h80rxlae.fsf@gnu.org> <8A5A507A-6036-4894-A8B1-749109EBE605@gmail.com> <83wo9mvwco.fsf@gnu.org> <2BEA3843-859E-481B-8561-35384438EF7F@gmail.com> <83lfpxs4sl.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="80730"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, john@yates-sheets.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 26 18:13:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ivlTY-000Kxm-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 18:13:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35548 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivlTX-0007oB-FD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:13:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ivlSy-0007Ms-9b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:12:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ivlSx-0005U8-0a; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:12:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3171 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ivlSk-0006vy-TX; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:12:43 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:18:27 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244660 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 23:18:27 -0500 > Cc: casouri@gmail.com, juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > That said I think that the current windowing model > > has a surprising semantic for dedicated, namely that > > a dedicated window is allowed to be split. > > That does surprise me -- but with so many possible cases, can we be sure > that it isn't sometime desirable to split those windows? FWIW, it doesn't surprise me: splitting a window still leaves the buffer displayed in one of the two windows, so the contract promised by "dedicated" still holds. We just made another window where there was none before, that's all. So yes, I think the ability to split such windows can be desirable 9in some use cases.