From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-tree-sitter and Emacs Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:33:54 +0300 Message-ID: <831rp5xbtp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83eeta3sa0.fsf@gnu.org> <86369ojbig.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83lfnfz6jr.fsf@gnu.org> <864ku3htmb.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83v9mix9vk.fsf@gnu.org> <87pncq55f8.fsf@md5i.com> <83imihyl42.fsf@gnu.org> <865zehgw5r.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="102720"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 09:34:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKGqn-000Qcb-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:34:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKGqj-0003zy-PA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 03:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKGq8-0003RZ-Rr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 03:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKGq8-0008GH-OA; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 03:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1082 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jKGq7-00057Z-IW; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 03:34:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <865zehgw5r.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (message from Stephen Leake on Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:06:40 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246307 Archived-At: > >> I would think that you at least need to parse everything displayed and > >> everything before what is displayed. (You need all prior context. What > >> if someone opened a comment on line 1 and hasn't closed it, for > >> example?) > > > > Each buffer always knows which part of it remains unchanged. > > Only because jit-lock-after-change on after-change-functions updates > that knowledge, via the fontified text property. But that in turn > assumes that the entire buffer has been fontified, which is typically > not the case; I rarely scroll thru an entire file. > > Unless there is some other mechanism that maintains change locations? I meant BEG_UNCHANGED and END_UNCHANGED.