From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scrolling commands and skipping redisplay, was: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:25:00 +0300 Message-ID: <831romceyb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200405195753.GG5049@ACM> <542b48ba-4dfa-820f-ba50-4b147ab6d8e2@yandex.ru> <0a5f70aa-4985-8f8d-81d6-6ac4a60a94f9@yandex.ru> <838sj8sphk.fsf@gnu.org> <834ktwsmfw.fsf@gnu.org> <83imibqsmm.fsf@gnu.org> <478c2aab-a5fc-61c2-02e2-2d9846b95273@yandex.ru> <83v9m9nltx.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1rn8fx.fsf@gnu.org> <4f8bb277-b376-97bf-8539-799688d8e66d@yandex.ru> <83eesvmj15.fsf@gnu.org> <6eec7f68-770e-b3b1-4627-6222f3ef7216@yandex.ru> <83ftd9kwlu.fsf@gnu.org> <1de9d24f-eeb7-7d0a-3768-4baba4365066@yandex.ru> <83zhbcdmyi.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9lyd49n.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="34082"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, acm@muc.de To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 17 17:26:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jPSsb-0008kn-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:26:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48492 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPSsa-00063S-Ja for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPSs3-0005d3-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:25:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPSs1-0002hM-UP; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3548 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jPSri-00071E-EZ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:25:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:13:27 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247173 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, acm@muc.de, rrandresf@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at > Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:13:27 -0400 > > > Like I said: redisplay itself calls those functions internally in many > > situations, and scroll-conservatively > 100 makes it use that much > > more. When I said above "almost every command", I meant redisplay > > triggered after commands that move point. > > But my understanding was that this part of the discussion was focused on > the distinction between "may run redisplay/jit-lock during the execution > of the command itself" vs "only runs jit-lock/redisplay once the command > itself is over". That was not my understanding, but if I misunderstood, apologies.