From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU
 Emacs?
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:38:50 +0300
Message-ID: <831roec7qt.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com>
 <835zdqc8ms.fsf@gnu.org>
 <0mzQyNNOqiV3kryyvOKfFFXEongGNN6Yb6wh0uwKR3RTwNe7h7pzoXD5SjivycXj5xjqi_6Q-hwetC0bT_71sB4EDwfe7wolddSYoaDhVc8=@protonmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="83707"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: ndame <ndame@protonmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 21:39:53 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jRhhR-000LiP-M6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:39:53 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jRhhQ-0000E3-P4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:39:52 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44886)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jRhgg-0007vh-TK
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:39:09 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54405)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jRhgg-00047j-G8; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:39:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2420 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jRhgf-00063g-63; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:39:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <0mzQyNNOqiV3kryyvOKfFFXEongGNN6Yb6wh0uwKR3RTwNe7h7pzoXD5SjivycXj5xjqi_6Q-hwetC0bT_71sB4EDwfe7wolddSYoaDhVc8=@protonmail.com>
 (message from ndame on Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:35:07 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247622
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/247622>

> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:35:07 +0000
> From: ndame <ndame@protonmail.com>
> Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> > > What about current popular packages outside Emacs? Were those developers
> > > all asked?
> >
> > Not all of them, but some were asked, yes.
> 
> And in those cases what were the typical reasons given for refusals?

They varied.  I suggest to look them up in the archives.