From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Survey: Toolbars Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:25:36 +0200 Message-ID: <831rfo8q73.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8iv3ac3.fsf@gnus.org> <838s9zavcx.fsf@gnu.org> <87im92nmd6.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2hx91u1.fsf@gnu.org> <87czz9enc6.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg858yjr.fsf@gnu.org> <878s9wetdb.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21141"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 17 15:26:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kpuES-0005Pl-Tg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:26:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpuES-0002Yt-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:26:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpuDv-000215-EJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:25:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpuDv-0003oM-7H; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:25:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3580 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kpuDp-0006nI-65; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:25:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878s9wetdb.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:20:32 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261107 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:20:32 +0100 > > > What's wrong with Options->Save Options? > > Nothing, except that people have been conditioned to expect that > changes in options get saved automatically, so we could do that for > them if they make the changes via the menus. Not sure I'd like it: it would make it harder to try an option without committing to using it. > On a related note, perhaps 'save options' should be the last entry > in the Options menu, to make it stand out more. Its current place is what it is because the items below it don't belong to "Options" saved by "Save Options". We could add some delimiter to make that more evident, but it isn't like the place is random or not well thought of.