From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:42:58 +0200 Message-ID: <831re71tnh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86eeifawx8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87czxygdl9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86tur88izp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <831rec5apu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1magg4x.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86sg6o6c43.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83o8hb21wk.fsf@gnu.org> <83czxr1zl3.fsf@gnu.org> <835z3j1x0h.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25914"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 18:47:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4SQk-0006bv-CZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:47:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4SQj-00025o-DD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4SMc-0007Ld-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4SMa-0000GP-Rd; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:42:49 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1680 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l4SMa-0004ii-2Q; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:42:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:27:58 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263477 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:27:58 -0500 > > > If elpa.git is not in the frame, then how did elpa/ada-mode wind up in > > emacs.git? > > Someone put it there manually. So when the upstream repository in elpa.git gets new commits, that someone will have to do that again?