From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: file-equal-p
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:26:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <831qmo3iz2.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rgxovyc.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:40:59 +0800)
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:40:59 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:34:04 +0800
> >>
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > It is still one more test, done for everyone.
> >>
> >> Is file-equal-p a function called in particularly tight loops?
> >
> > I don't know, but punishing everyone for the benefit of a single OS
> > sounds wrong to me.
>
> Why would a single conditional be punishment, though?
It takes non-zero CPU time.
Anyway, why would you object to a simple request to re-arrange your
change slightly? I don't understand why such a simple request needs
several messages to discuss, even if you don't consider the request
necessary? Don't we both have more useful things to invest our time?"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87a61es8fh.fsf.ref@yahoo.com>
2023-02-16 1:30 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-16 8:18 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-16 8:43 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-16 8:57 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-16 9:59 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-16 11:52 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-16 12:34 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-16 12:42 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-17 2:40 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-17 6:26 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-02-17 7:07 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-17 8:32 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-17 11:05 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-16 9:15 ` file-equal-p Andreas Schwab
2023-02-16 9:58 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-16 10:35 ` file-equal-p Michael Albinus
2023-02-16 12:35 ` file-equal-p Po Lu
2023-02-16 12:43 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-17 4:50 ` file-equal-p Richard Stallman
2023-02-17 10:02 ` file-equal-p Andreas Schwab
2023-02-17 12:25 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-17 12:45 ` file-equal-p tomas
2023-02-17 13:17 ` file-equal-p Andreas Schwab
2023-02-18 12:25 ` file-equal-p Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-18 14:04 ` file-equal-p Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=831qmo3iz2.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=luangruo@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).