From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Donald Ephraim Curtis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: adding a standard font-lock-number-face Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:42:06 -0500 Message-ID: <8314F6E4-3F4F-4C54-A80C-604DF83E1A52@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308344239 26874 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2011 20:57:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel , Fabian Ezequiel Gallina To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 22:57:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXg6G-0007Zm-EQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:57:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37316 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXg6F-0002GX-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXfrp-0006Td-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXfrl-0006JG-Jh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:55636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXfrl-0006J6-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: by iyl8 with SMTP id 8so3090406iyl.0 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=OILerHZ+tQFC2M+k/bgdg7UprDsJXHVc6EB5ATGt0og=; b=Skk0vHEB4/+lxWnrxtSNe+53q8IGmYprmDbFDWKZH2bp47r7mc61PO5pMm9b38bX84 ucFr11P8R+ABriVGerKNIQw8LVGL1pWLU4AAbGZyii4qZrMPoO2jYrm0cq6k9buPMXHr T8jWA30QKktOGobXR+MoysRe2/ByhUMRQv9cY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=gx3qGMBeFW6splAZB+KYO6li7V4EbLWsMYdUYjZ/+P+HWk3mHjcN0oKJtAVUNXfnDh zZno97pOwpKRLozWjtqZ//C2Kmxt/SCePcniNefquKMnVie79kn9zhXiqXGrJCVSmp0y NxEsutZcO6pkgv6bXWsP9sAcJHkKsBTV/gg7g= Original-Received: by 10.42.147.193 with SMTP id o1mr2503299icv.151.1308343328153; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from dhcpw80ffc068.dynamic.uiowa.edu (dhcpw80ffc068.dynamic.uiowa.edu [128.255.192.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm1643161ibc.8.2011.06.17.13.42.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:42:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140628 Archived-At: Deadlock :: = http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-mode/2011-June/001161.html So python-mode/python.el *would*, but since Emacs doesn't have a = "number-face" built in, they dare not. And Emacs won't because no = packages do =96 although `jdee` does define a = `jde-java-font-lock-number-face`. On Jun 17, 2011, at 11:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> that will likely help also to improve things avoiding the creation of >> new non standard faces in external packages. >=20 > Show me the packages which have a "number-face" and could hence = benefit > from sharing a standardized face for it.