From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Adolf Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Thoughts on Refactoring In-Buffer Completion In message.el Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:48:43 +0200 Message-ID: <82bcbbfcd7b30a5cb7aa4b56f5be8cf3@condition-alpha.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21154"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thomas Fitzsimmons Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 18:13:02 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o5rME-0005JS-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:13:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50292 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5rMC-00052s-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5qyr-0002pQ-I4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.13]:60145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5qym-0005lt-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [46.244.205.209] (helo=condition-alpha.com) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1o5qzY-0001F4-OP; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:49:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Df-Sender: YWxleGFuZGVyLmFkb2xmQGNvbmRpdGlvbi1hbHBoYS5jb20= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.67.18.13; envelope-from=alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com; helo=smtprelay01.ispgateway.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291665 Archived-At: Hello Thomas, Thomas Fitzsimmons writes: > [...] > Nice overview, thanks. Do you think it will be possible to do this > refactoring as a series of small individual patches, each of which keeps > things working? I think a series of proposed changes will be easier to > discuss. > [...] You have a good point here. I'll try to structure it that way. Not sure whether all|some patches will meet everybody's definition of "small" though... ;-) But I'll try to keep the as small as reasonably possible. --alexander