From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Memory leak due to bidi? Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:15:46 +0100 Message-ID: <82aabokbtp.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83ei12pi0l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312499787 4519 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2011 23:16:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 23:16:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 05 01:16:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp79K-00040y-I9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:16:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56685 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp79J-000126-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:16:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp79G-000121-MU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:16:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp79F-0007sR-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:16:18 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp79F-0007sL-Jh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp79E-0003y5-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:16:16 +0200 Original-Received: from 82-69-64-228.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([82.69.64.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:16:16 +0200 Original-Received: from andrewjmoreton by 82-69-64-228.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:16:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-69-64-228.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5GWjR2bYHK65v18dFv9Pl9/n3cA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142892 Archived-At: On Wed 03 Aug 2011, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:01:32 +0100 >> >> I'm running rev 105300 to write this, which seems to be OK. > > If 105300 is OK (and you didn't mistype the revision number ;-), then > the commit I feared most (105208) is off the hook. > >> I'll keep bisecting to narrow down where things start misbehaving. > > Thank you. I've updated bug#9221 to mention that bisecting seems to point to somewhere between r105368 (good) and r105375 (bad). AndyM