From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.windows Subject: Re: emacs-20111107-r106319 Windows Binaries Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:15:46 +0530 Message-ID: <81obwn5cyt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4EB8B41F.10604@gmail.com> <81sjlz5elr.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320734781 25954 80.91.229.12 (8 Nov 2011 06:46:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 07:46:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNfRo-00010s-UR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:46:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33783 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNfRl-0005Oj-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:46:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNfRg-0005DK-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:46:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNfRf-0004SF-S8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]:48767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNfRd-0004Rk-Hg; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:46:05 -0500 Original-Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so616846pzk.6 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:46:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=iNaQnmKsZ3m7zJV+drVYEc+oM4ScbDW3VEKh180WLkE=; b=iSqFyludAUuqJNgGzL8abXxhrt9duofTozO77irq7rYkhlSOf8po2DbbkUyf/K4Qcf D3GpnIoeYrv/tOmeILktEhZCu06y3DydZ1H0dxT+xY1uDSFXMtPne4FSirkJCY+c4+Gi qNvlju2qRJdecOgCTTcwWGpkEC6DS+IYQez7s= Original-Received: by 10.68.24.65 with SMTP id s1mr5258958pbf.12.1320734764273; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:46:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from JAMBU-NETBOOK ([115.184.122.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lk8sm1998503pbb.4.2011.11.07.22.45.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:46:03 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , cschol2112@googlemail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, help-emacs-windows@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:30:13 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.47 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145938 gmane.emacs.windows:5146 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Jambunathan K >> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:40:24 +0530 >> Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, Emacs-Devel devel >> >> Hello Chirstoph >> >> > The Emacs Trunk Windows Binaries (bzr revno 106319) have been published in >> > >> > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ >> >> Thanks for these binaries. >> >> I do see a build dated Nov 7: >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-20111107-r106319-bin-i386.zip >> >> But there in nothing dated in month of November here: >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/ >> >> Would it possible for you to move the newly built binary to pretest dir >> and assign it a name in 24.0.9* series? > > This is not a pretest, but a trunk snapshot. Why would you want it to > be in the pretest/ directory? That would be confusing. OK, I understand, it is a question of practice and tradition. ps: I thought that a trunk snapshot after a pretest is better than pretest - what with checkin controls and feature freezes etc - and hence qualifies as a pretest build. I think what you mean here is that - it is not blessed by the maintainers and it will not be widely announced. Jambunathan K.