From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruce Stephens Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is the proper way to set the default font these days? Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:14:12 +0100 Message-ID: <80eisaxe4b.fsf@tiny.isode.net> References: <7b501d5c0906060758n3113b6cdr37a5635b389428b8@mail.gmail.com> <87ab4k3g04.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4A2BB621.201@harpegolden.net> <7b501d5c0907011535u712bd57ase521a1cb211bb4ee@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C5731.1020209@swipnet.se> <4A4C67B9.8070703@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248189836 21220 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2009 15:23:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:23:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 21 17:23:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MTHC1-0000UG-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:23:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59496 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTHC0-0004sl-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:23:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTH2t-0000Yd-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:14:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTH2o-0000X8-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:14:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54482 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTH2o-0000Wx-Fl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rufus.isode.com ([62.3.217.251]:57256) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTH2n-00033w-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: from tiny.isode.net (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (smtp internal) via TCP with SMTP id for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:14:12 +0100 Original-Received: by tiny.isode.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:14:12 +0100 X-Hashcash: 1:20:090721:emacs-devel@gnu.org::RPpyHscTK48dxudz:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001K3d In-Reply-To: <4A4C67B9.8070703@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv=22's?= message of "Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:54:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112916 Archived-At: Jan Dj=C3=A4rv writes: [...] > Never mind, I found the error. Emacs kind of assumes the window > manager will eventually honor a resize request Emacs does. XMonad > breaks this assumtion. > Try it now. These fixes don't appear to be on the 23 release branch, so (presuming that's the case) 23.1 will still be broken (in a minor way, admittedly). That's a perfectly reasonable decision to make (especially if the issue only affects xmonad), but was it a decision or were the changes just not applied by accident?