From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruce Stephens Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs HEAD regressions (another test case) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:30:16 +0000 Message-ID: <80d4dvsnfb.fsf@tiny.isode.net> References: <498964C5.5020906@alice.it> <18826.28789.943303.596345@priss.frightenedpiglet.com> <498ABAAC.3040308@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233945267 18930 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2009 18:34:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:34:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 06 19:35:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LVVYD-0005t4-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:35:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVVWt-0005js-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVQml-0007EN-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVQml-0007Dv-Cq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53292 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVQml-0007Dp-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rufus.isode.com ([62.3.217.251]:36480) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVQmk-0003OJ-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from tiny.isode.net (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (smtp internal) via TCP with SMTP id for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:30:16 +0000 Original-Received: by tiny.isode.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:30:16 +0000 X-Hashcash: 1:20:090206:emacs-devel@gnu.org::X+YU9RHDOQ6HqyHO:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000005m5p In-Reply-To: <498ABAAC.3040308@alice.it> (Angelo Graziosi's message of "Thu\, 05 Feb 2009 11\:08\:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:34:16 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108830 Archived-At: Angelo Graziosi writes: [...] > Indeed! The attached script 'prints' 6x1024 'x' characters, and on > GNU/LINUX KUBUNTU 8.04.02 it takes: > > 4 seconds with Emacs CVS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO (<=) 20090129 15:30 > > 2:15 minutes, i.e. 60x2+15=135 seconds with Emacs GREATER THAN OR EQUAL > TO (>=) 20090129 15:40! I think it's the pending_signals changes, dated (in the git repository) 2009-01-29 14:32:21 to 2009-01-29 14:35:25. If I revert those, then HEAD gives the ~4 seconds behaviour. (I guess the apparent time difference is because you're in a +0100 timezone.) [...]