From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug of display-table & make-glyph-code Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:44:07 -0400 Message-ID: <7utzq71c7s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <200708271732.22306.zslevin@gmail.com> <46DD9F41.8090700@gmx.at> <46DE63EE.3070509@gmx.at> <46DE7DBA.90408@gmx.at> <46DEE8AB.9050203@gmx.at> <46DFBF17.4010702@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189129482 5779 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2007 01:44:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 01:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 03:44:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITStd-0007t0-GU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:44:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITStb-00049m-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITStY-00049X-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:44:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITStW-00049L-NB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITStW-00049I-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITStW-0003KA-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITStD-0006xx-5E; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:44:07 -0400 X-Spook: Qaddafi ASO SAFE AFSPC credit card Majic Europol Lon X-Ran: %)$#4Ch4g3[4$(Nq%;9@g)}'Fcm2^[l`Gy9-|QRaqz=QF+Z&ga:"&3,Q:^XT>3Jy83Kih* X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <46DFBF17.4010702@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:49:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78056 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > Mapping dired-warning to font-lock-warning-face was a bad idea: The > latter is already used for marking and flagging. Does that matter? The marking and flagging faces seem to be applied to the file name. The warning face seems only to be applied to the permissions. So it's not like they overlap or anything. And I think a warning should be displayed in, umm, a warning face (so it has emphasis), rather than a comment face (so it is subdued).