From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Yanking isearch to highlight-regexp Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:54:50 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0806141454q13ac23aene1c31934c899c95b@mail.gmail.com> References: <4853F884.7000609@gmail.com> <7dbe73ed0806141442h342f8ff0u83863f3980a7e229@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213480514 465 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2008 21:55:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , Emacs Devel To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 14 23:55:57 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K7diz-00082f-Io for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:55:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K7diB-0003XZ-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7di1-0003Ph-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K7di0-0003OR-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36674 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K7dhz-0003O4-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.157]:37914) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K7dhz-0004Ig-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so2648614ywk.66 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=oYaSt6ytlsK7riGNV2C1RBOp7RKyEbrZmsHDSMShUHY=; b=JCtKjoeZckukCnW5QecwoFJyrgey0OWaaeYC786sDFFxoyPfLP/dU86eA97i4hq02O gabunjhiZ8LT8MiW+SMt5VUehSVomIkSQgvJLoZE2Jn4UvZguqEKrQlFHpiQ7E7MysZf V+nNL17QZcZ0IvxlsIVw2HyZ6yvitOOlft5Vs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=LtPoiPapWSO9wjtmewmGXXS/yo+sYVXJdsSpa30wGKWkBosFHSLbxhFl1YjhluxFqQ 9tEQdOLjGdpqGNPJXL6XRWb85ZUVgXsG1RPmCPX6X0q7YclnbRrMGB1nqXQAOsd6OZZ+ D08hXLSISsZIlCq2zD4QBSrykxH4GVZWTNzX0= Original-Received: by 10.150.218.10 with SMTP id q10mr7368232ybg.55.1213480490556; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.15.17 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:54:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99225 Archived-At: >> It would probably also be >> useful to go directly from an isearch into highlight-regexp. How > > You mean in the same way as C-M-% has a special binding in isearch? Yes. > I guess that would make a lot of sense, except that highlight-regexp > doesn't have any keybinding, Now, I don't even need this feature because I use highlight-regexp very seldom so I am not arguing, but generally speaking, why is it a problem if we wanted to add this even though highlight-regexp has no default keybinding? Is it because having no default keybinding implies that a command is not very much used (by most users)?