From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding [was: position on changing defaults?] Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:13:07 +0100 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0803100313g46d079dag91e1b8af1f750ee8@mail.gmail.com> References: <200803050637.m256bXL3008361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87pru8enjx.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <871w6l3u8f.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <871w6j7cga.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <003001c8823a$d7cd5010$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87lk4r5v2o.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <003101c88242$18736fd0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205144013 23187 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2008 10:13:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, "Kim F. Storm" To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 10 11:14:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYf10-0004Re-8e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:13:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYf0R-0004JX-Pm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:13:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYf0I-0004Gz-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYf0G-0004EO-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYf0G-0004EC-IR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYf0G-0001qr-2R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so2215177wah.10 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:13:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=msQsu/zAW81ySoiL74+EjTJ1s++uWz3+JUdDAR+PK/U=; b=cSNfLmw4d7Agg6B8BGIGHXqRMV/+JXpqvKYPQGdFF7DqGRUL3ujvf2sqDnUb4fTDOmEEP/E9JzhpFfaZnusFz7Rjtf41mQdnJo74Zzusvf8S7I8fa+CQyNsIS9Quwj1iNrLfo4xuAiQwkmJDLmbScrDtl4i5T+QIReM7ub8t9xQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IsdHFQxb52ErSG/6CMziaot2AHPPPwlTVHp+dffQmj4mmvHzrRJPo6BLcKK9+pHMT/J2gw+bqoShu7hZvTDNDICWH2L7RG5lKND6DLIlazNZmg21Jbje3csRstoJ5Bm5RQ4vfnfIXNusUnZLXhZ6nGa03Mh0u+1lVoiwSjcWAlY= Original-Received: by 10.114.14.1 with SMTP id 1mr3170848wan.9.1205143987191; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.146.9 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:13:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <003101c88242$18736fd0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92019 Archived-At: > Here's another thought, FWIW. Does it make sense to set the rectangle mark > in the minibuffer? I use rectangles quite a lot and have never needed it in the minibuffer. This is not saying it isn't useful there, of course. In general I tend to avoid too much editing in the minibuffer, especially for multi-line data because it kinda feels scary, one wrong keypress and my data will either be accepted (typing RET instead of C-j) or gone (typing arrow up/down). It would be interesting to know if other people do much multi-line editing here.