From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de: image-dired (tumme) database file not existing] Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:36:02 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0707211636n2a3cc098weded799f8b098803@mail.gmail.com> References: <87y7hcxz5x.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185060972 4113 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2007 23:36:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Thien-Thi Nguyen" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 22 01:36:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ICOUb-0001NR-M8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:36:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICOUb-0000hn-5y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ICOUY-0000hi-1b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ICOUV-0000hW-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICOUV-0000hT-Ho for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.187]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ICOUV-00057Y-75 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so129439fkr for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AjdNPjsl5J/g3noMgI01SE+g3VeXRcAzVPm72QWc8K/Q6RlI4alTUMrc1sNQMLkYqJ/Z29xJjBStjNQ2uvDj+8z4EZShtp9z7FNorx3Qkw/2YPC82HBpY7fEQl1DiKP7JxUX1DQkAWkDBSRlhoRNd4GY47fE5WAi3/WchYLaQts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZOsou4o0SW06a1xOPGJK8sG9RHL2bu6/tVo2lmN+LgEV+sMr18RpQ52+pkEP9l+qWlwFXb5tL08YGThVBnrgMJWAwdXAcZJrFDpOJvz+nmQXR4WEV3cnMSeOCN9vAGs+ZK9uYUkWPSb9WUsamMZyCbezzpQdEKxwDdTFD4PW2NA= Original-Received: by 10.82.158.12 with SMTP id g12mr1347411bue.1185060962099; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.82.117.9 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y7hcxz5x.fsf@ambire.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75266 Archived-At: > below is a quick patch (against the trunk). > here is a ChangeLog entry: > > * image-dired.el (image-dired-sane-db-file): New func. > (image-dired-write-tags, image-dired-remove-tag) > (image-dired-list-tags, image-dired-write-comments) > (image-dired-get-comment, image-dired-mark-tagged-files) > (image-dired-create-gallery-lists): Call new func. Since there has been no strong objection (mine is more a philosophical one and not a very strong one) I think we should install your fix. We can always debate the differences later; the fix does solve the problem and does not cause any problems as far as I can see.