From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-warning-face hard to read because it is bold Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:22:57 +0100 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0701180022v2b9aa077k9b412ab5c436c415@mail.gmail.com> References: <45AEB7D7.8060806@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169108601 5149 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2007 08:23:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , lennart.borgman@gmail.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 18 09:23:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H7SYC-00025p-QG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:23:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7SYD-0001EN-Dq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:23:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7SY3-0001EI-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7SXz-0001De-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7SXz-0001Db-CT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:22:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.175] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H7SXz-0004hB-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:22:59 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so130247ugf for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:22:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sI5XZXABGxu5MLlSbAwzHmXx9IuMNgVRcbhVi/5jNpP/0WqFqpPgU70u7RroFHIvIqNQ28grWUZS8V+EbV0tUpFcpC0xOwimiD+VUooSKTniOHK68lGsTL9r41thRMFsgKkO3rPvXHENPX3S1zcRYZPfxfxchbztQBVWC9THmfI= Original-Received: by 10.78.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr622295hud.1169108577501; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:22:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.78.12.17 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:22:57 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Kenichi Handa" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65270 Archived-At: > Please note that what you sent is an captured screen image > which is what your computer want to display, not the actual > image you see on your screen. > > So it may be displayed badly on a ill-tuned display, but > displayed clearly on a well-tuned display. I can verify that this can indeed be the case. Earlier this week I was testing Windows Vista at a collegue's computer and when running it I wondered why all colors were so ugly? They were all very "white" or "bleached". I thought "Was this the best they could come up with?" It turned out, of course, that his flat-screen was totally messed up, the colours looked bad in Windows XP as well. Also, Lennart, maybe you need glasses? :) Seriously, I though my screen was blurry for a couple of years before I discovered I had astigmatism...