From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mathias Dahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [joe-emacs-bugs@elem.com: change to file on disk not noticed by indirect buffer] Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:25:34 +0200 Message-ID: <7dbe73ed0607071525u76704f3axb579d01fdb109715@mail.gmail.com> References: <7dbe73ed0607060822o39c58a54t10d3d1ccd7f0723c@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152311154 3932 80.91.229.2 (7 Jul 2006 22:25:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 22:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 08 00:25:52 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fyyli-0006u2-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:25:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fyylh-0001Dl-H2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:25:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyylW-0001DW-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:25:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyylU-0001Bt-GZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyylU-0001Bl-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:25:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.189] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fyylz-0002eK-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so16290nfc for ; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hVrjfNFHMojx8RKhfl1j8apyZ7RO/QRIpGSTebslpPLG+tuMTn4i4eAWyAfmVvb1JREpxSviaCm/atXH1VB2/wz6ovA62xE7lgaEZ2dQaC6NKadhUyM62w8ih8Q2qe+3dVf0Ne+icqhAQr3lNzmczlPGdgKN8826EGN9jOmITyA= Original-Received: by 10.48.80.3 with SMTP id d3mr1832613nfb; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.248.13 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56748 Archived-At: > Maybe it is correct for C-x C-v in an indirect buffer to replace > only that indirect buffer. I think so, but I use the indirect buffer feature very seldom, if ever.