From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we support apt's funky ANSI escapes? Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:38:44 -0400 Message-ID: <7ce93cad-78d2-ceb7-24d1-1e47bcbc4090@gmail.com> References: <9c095f48-7d17-dcd8-2afd-6b0263d78264@live.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CsIsIpDfka8H5INh3rG7mVre8ntojgPGl" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469043596 27791 80.91.229.3 (20 Jul 2016 19:39:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:39:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 20 21:39:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxLP-0006zw-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:39:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxLO-0004DU-LF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxKc-0004Bx-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxKX-0005rb-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.73]:62936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxKW-0005rP-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:38:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.17.11.203] ([162.223.5.123]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2dAz-1b6mNy3I6X-00sOtP for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:38:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:B+e09H2SvuFz6EOn0cZ6tEhLPmBIMEEW8zjpxdjOH0Nzj15Ll4Z hTGt5weKC1zi16gHwfpyWf6lRsRPr4H2RaXn1lGuOs6J3PPinBgG6vTNy0ecmRJXPAKGjSc uhjU1jGJ7jKuJtSfZUMlCoyqOXG5XqcXzMbxFefLlpdP7azgbTEnN4e6JJCNWHdB/QWWTnG 8nXMdmaAi7hNBU2Gubo7A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:SU8AoFwAkIU=:Cqk4dixK0Li7FQz8wQ97k4 +/o4MxVUd9KDWq0Cm/faHWQFPzTVbEv/AnxlrpvX3AFM02QMAze+L9Mj85ixUVPM3l3x8MT44 wpLX6GKyLSJo8FO9S4Oyy3zzZ7VO/p7wGmE+OJZjpS74kkzhSqNTSUeFbq3FVWATQibvM5O8n Qgi8wQnCNqbbA4NdBFlrWzBn11aZZIGUQrUxh8ahXMD0XF9XedhG1wI81PI6lY8BlnDlitl4Q IlGbgqwpJfyawLJyA8w7KYN2OsfIhmBchYhLW9yjwuzP+EdpQLKdbQzAACoBkKmw9N1FnpTmO /oYYMcup5Cjcin1shNCxfpvilcKokm6xUFcRw+HRJSks18rTWD3vyxRXwwi0EJb6z4QSlw2RS akhCRxPlPzKUykozJkZBQp9wlaKjk8NwVcfPRE38RIlvBM3PrpVyYu0LxxRr7+t72WTyBuQQw YQbzsCS01BBwxDmK37wBVovZlXhW+K6DNgv0oZrbeydXL4C/uJBtPl6atyhsRu9kAMRJH3gNz +c07Y0on+tXlQseWEZTW9I3CF0y1Wh/vC/qP/p8ZhfV0GvCwkpGDQngYB/f0aDunQaXrkvfwV CAH8qlRmIpu2E9Q92s1AMBiKWDO0Lp+hCZkRIikKW2NUKBDw0Ws/z4YwjDT4aBeimjg+kv/jc 06GbFeM5xXnC+EloralTVVXKrupwnPoXn7KPu7oUW3ANrUVMN2B2QW/ZKJ/1Xacae+rk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.73 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205916 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CsIsIpDfka8H5INh3rG7mVre8ntojgPGl Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="2VjX82AVeDIjmatcM41M7KXBLw3ALfaTw" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <7ce93cad-78d2-ceb7-24d1-1e47bcbc4090@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Can we support apt's funky ANSI escapes? References: <9c095f48-7d17-dcd8-2afd-6b0263d78264@live.com> In-Reply-To: --2VjX82AVeDIjmatcM41M7KXBLw3ALfaTw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-07-20 13:05, Robert Weiner wrote: > What happens if you use {M-x ansi-term RET}? I guess it would work fine, but I'd rather not use ansi-term, if possible= =2E --2VjX82AVeDIjmatcM41M7KXBLw3ALfaTw-- --CsIsIpDfka8H5INh3rG7mVre8ntojgPGl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXj9NEAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjVIwP/RuSE0DGJXDDHiw4MB+HBnuM +8IyXEXjPve4ap0lVaRHN0lT1zkiGeKQTqqIinYdNOXDN33nVLgMdVp2u7ccrhFc V+K/4s9B0sx6ixInvjhSf+ThIrl5zspMIPs9gCxfeKtHPZw60RCcKWISBIkavI76 oieAM2AwIGMqOoIzVAADstZljtAY9K/SRL5sEVr7hOsGHav2a6ka6ayjZCF9flF0 x81ywyD3yzw2lfkySE4BkrNmP7c7CQy0gR3xiiANIHCMlQrH1vlGAtw1y17N2yiC Cj5nq60tItJpNvVDtmOpTaw9F9nIJDXdkUeOWHw2vETqkwIe0KNk/agUYHZYHFOT 2CRJYbOoeowDumc+9AcaMibVOGPWltUM/sanOynfw+Z+UWWBehVk+Z2x888PmZIt VZO+u9C0G0bFc3MFzMOFqxRniYBDAcW+NTGuM8kLhfs46uVt7cpGMBzzbkH1wJky pU2EHg0nUimac2b2NZxeGIb2gvmvBo+tCExlWudPeqVVnec6NEFMD0paRd0+W/zE bGPVOxAXtYGQv4vkzUYmCGOXNv18O+jtY4IlslfwJcH88IZoTZVmz+VQT0OFwPU1 rmtUlD/yiS0nhs2FZh//VZt67raDoh7qS9dgmDmK6471rL8V7i4OM0RbbfHfMOEc m2HKshCRycBQES2AaZ6i =Sb4y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CsIsIpDfka8H5INh3rG7mVre8ntojgPGl--