From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Beyond release Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <7c2ab4b6-4781-e553-53f3-52fca9b647fc@online.de> References: <5254d43b-39dd-7ac2-03d7-349e6d710a6b@online.de> <577135CD.1040605@gmail.com> <8a06c531-eac2-cfd5-eab0-6bf197e8c3e0@online.de> <57714BA1.8030506@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467050807 25817 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2016 18:06:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:06:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 20:06:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHavh-0005HH-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:06:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60316 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHavg-0005qt-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:06:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHauz-0005lb-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHauv-0003I9-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:61880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHauu-0003Hv-PM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([77.12.118.111]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEfH7-1b6IMg3ei9-00FkKq for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:05:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KB33tXJBjcXOh35fNXGjxyGkXF8FiCO6gfQyx03mWlLnkD0j5nR PnjHEH2HHyksRRPDLsA/PtqjN7T6J/Yw/NFWJKzK7r/YwoJMbmZIU0UlfeggEWDqKwc+xpJ 4Bn3mkXV4w2M/cgsPa5aJ948rT1g+5sAi2rX08r9QldX3oxngLx34VDgt0QvfMK5ba6pdTR bgLbT7U6dhB9i4Ihi6B/w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:r8bNg+CBIQI=:ho6H4sx7xfm+lk58JxnT2A dqND6UG6xS2CPt1QTcYorZ0LyJ/B0/SNc8tzQ0hI3H75k8ZwjinDOLzRubRSm7DWKq0bdeb+z +VdIsy9dizBQl1hqZFdu+nJ/kiig5xtxVBdwPrRPR3Cr0wTvlVWHoLxYnP2Juu6X6GNVoCaso xZs9ZG2CQcw/0GSz47wxYphBfuPaEaeHq/G0o5cPhNiUDI8QUAagagRY+CBA2YMuM5RY0zyNv +c9GoXU45TrdhOUcclyQ5OzkXJvKu4cZ8kxH1dEQuR+dNgnklxfwroI6LycJ9HbBNXXJG5Z0G J/7hU2KGo9x+mWf2GQAsJJBrIxPFGpfbUT/rXYLzeByqghXwyPzQUkvhKuj054rggp4oZwE4z z+3LzpEfH4TagvfQjIa11nrlnXcFX0IwIalUCJzz38NsntijZjIt5Lphz+kxAOBefmBfM2z/6 mHcicG7Jl/1nR5H+5RMy0larL5O0UMC09+luZT7s8BLRuT+0rVehBy17JuvEhIQ86IjLrxB2G FCRxogv606gXdXqx2fAzTaYb+kclHqMQEnANyRPVFeY1jI7D2ftXPC73Pq1LvrboW8pdTINxo tju04IJmhP2fbFPShu9m2jOJof6cl40DUgtivN7UF3wSOFkpivhvLR+WlmQ27goK2c9/Ucj+J zD871GnC9rLclVagjIK1+7bLyZtq7iwyIiZotwNQnUKHZGKS45BdjwJMP/8NhM2VEcEVig6Op uVOxIT3+KpJWI2cj X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204827 Archived-At: On 27.06.2016 18:55, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 06/27/2016 07:25 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote: > >>> Until someone presents concrete evidence, this is just FUD. You can >>> pay it no attention. >>> >> >> syntax-propertize-function: > > Quotes from Emacs's source code are not sufficient evidence of your > claims. > Not if you snip a relevant part. (defun syntax-propertize (pos) "Ensure that syntax-table properties are set until POS (a buffer point)." (when (< syntax-propertize--done pos) (if (null syntax-propertize-function) (setq syntax-propertize--done (max (point-max) pos)) ;; (message "Needs to syntax-propertize from %s to %s" ;; syntax-propertize--done pos) (set (make-local-variable 'parse-sexp-lookup-properties) t) (save-excursion (with-silent-modifications ... where (if (null syntax-propertize-function) wouldn't pos a problem. However, when called from syntax-propertize-function, this certainly wont be null, then the propertize-branch is entered. Might the branches be simple bound wrong, i.e. reverse?