From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Deniz Dogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is the proper way to set the default font these days? Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:59:59 +0200 Message-ID: <7b501d5c0906100859g2b70396ar4bce4ec9db31f1a9@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b501d5c0906060758n3113b6cdr37a5635b389428b8@mail.gmail.com> <8763f6g61q.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <7b501d5c0906080759wba474b4re93ecbfdf94c9629@mail.gmail.com> <873aaag1wf.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <871vpug0np.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87prdebsvd.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <7b501d5c0906080928jde3c545o67a1731680f1dace@mail.gmail.com> <7b501d5c0906100217w62516bd8o4f5905665135a2a9@mail.gmail.com> <87prdcccha.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1244649846 9628 80.91.229.12 (10 Jun 2009 16:04:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David De La Harpe Golden , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 10 18:04:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MEQHS-0006Se-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:04:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39175 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEQHR-0006QU-M8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEQDf-0005V7-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEQDb-0005TF-B9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55686 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEQDb-0005TA-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:60744) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEQDZ-0003MW-IB; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so1109749fxm.42 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:59:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T1q4K3uKvRPCwyNVevVYRWJtXQl2vZ7aJj36PFM1rY0=; b=HlJD6UXFxVnzTs54rxninzG8dBuwNUn6G1nUsRG8nWuawqYpU8QbkgAHMeJSCuESSB uPcKkmibxmMHu9ixD0VnZDf+qJfI4tK5RrXV+Y/Z61rwmETzkRu0/pQAW6WNCoTN1a0D LTTWi1pIwoO+p16pA7RR007yOsEWHQxyD03wM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=inWjACPxeyiw/2+CaVZbjwTAsPSMo3fldjDO2mE+Nhpg56LtpRGbPKbJUorEhoZOdR xk/80GUysV+zEz9lppHfme2HHp3ha23TzIA+6aKbpvrLk7jy8sJzWM3OWHaMsjR+ZVYK B13aBXDGHh5hrOU749bR7C2XmQDHw6Hr8GTD8= Original-Received: by 10.86.25.10 with SMTP id 10mr1219244fgy.79.1244649599115; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:59:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87prdcccha.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111415 Archived-At: 2009/6/10 Chong Yidong : > Deniz Dogan writes: > >> Having talked to some people on the XMonad mailing list, it seems that >> it is probably Emacs that has the bug in this case. > > What's the reasoning behind this conclusion? > > It sounds like you have two separate issues: (i) font setting in X > resources not being recognized, and (ii) incorrect window sizing. > [...] > But as for (i), I find it hard to imagine how this can be an Emacs bug. > [...] I apologize. I should have been more clear about the fact that setting the font in .Xdefaults works just fine, but the window sizing doesn't. -- Deniz Dogan