From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: REDO ? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:21:28 +0100 Message-ID: <7E75A5C3-7720-4276-8F89-7FBBF0BD45E2@gmail.com> References: <17190643.437781177343203022.JavaMail.www@wwinf4203> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177431716 8219 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2007 16:21:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:21:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alinsoar@voila.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 24 18:21:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgNls-00074p-0a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:21:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgNrO-0001lX-Jr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgNrL-0001lI-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:27:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgNrI-0001l6-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgNrI-0001l3-At for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgNll-0007fW-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:21:33 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so217229ugf for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:21:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=QBcMcpQcFQJhOiR45z6nTNJTp5z+Tn1kC4AQVztn1FjiOudcISKM7EdA8Hj8/+6leSI6xvO2kXEmXrXpeqHmfMElxP1wtfypwAMhXMAx+Zl50W5CRYjVmuVZ3Bx6f+VSIup32+YjN6OfbWkK1TnDMgrE3ZBjo094u/1KKcPGbZU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=opGof6Hm5OSdB97jcuVPmDJ3BIOxJpkLrWkLLBzPa3EcVCPl3rRUIoi2iHGqZxggDq4yrE+yRLvbrDrmBgmbZ5IUbE72HCLhb6IISlT3fYWtmjJfsu9eZiyTJ/kX0s/jSiYTjAtdFYUMk0JTKHqYV/yKzJsk4G8XqxCu6dctbTY= Original-Received: by 10.66.242.20 with SMTP id p20mr692629ugh.1177431692077; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?129.215.174.81? ( [129.215.174.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b35sm1633644ugd.2007.04.24.09.21.30; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:21:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69949 Archived-At: On 24 Apr 2007, at 17:03, Richard Stallman wrote: > A while agao, we integrated an undo/redo function into Aquamacs, > because that's what users generally get in programs running on > that > specific OS. > > What is the user interface? A-z `aquamacs-undo' (similar to `undo-only') A-Z `aquamacs-redo' C-_ `undo' A-z and A-Z the standard keys on the Mac. Note that A- is bound to the "command" key. This is probably not something that can be done in GNU Emacs. It would be nice if the region was restored by the revised `undo' (if the mark was active) (as a customization option). NB, that would interfere with selective `undo'.