From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Saulius_Menkevi=C4=8Dius?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2c79a8f 2/2: Use posix_spawn if possible. Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:54:44 +0200 Message-ID: <7BD6026F-D756-42C3-9FCC-724D9A6B2378@fastmail.com> References: <87czk5brgr.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com, matt@rfc20.org, Eli Zaretskii , mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 02 13:27:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFEjW-000AMT-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 13:27:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFEjU-00045Z-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:27:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFBPi-00063V-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:55:00 -0500 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:36699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFBPg-0005Qt-6d; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:54:54 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF3832022E0; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 03:54:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 03:54:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=gTHkn+Lu/SEYEY pzf7VspBcrByCX+JrNZjxL8vifsys=; b=Kn9/34aES2eMEL7uHfftHnlNbQgJZc nBRRRfMxUKuedM6d1H/JxHQmRDPsvY+39pAjOdQKOQqsXbgPLMYSQGnmAw+18N1c HHOqL4XZP4yqwf+eoZFYp4UpB8KXG4MzBKuSU1jtj6rClE2ydt6NbKsrfsUYArnf +s1+LnDMTB8rfVi3/ugfL0XwOAzkN8uq4k4X/j5CcMQkqmc820fMLBydae0NVRp2 KCEIcndMPKVsG+bY8a4Idn7rppi3NY7wpQyOyFp3tEW4Qn6XPfe4IVUTcWtWVkTR t4u0kW5FIxIi/9h/U6mNtr/NB/T0/ecCSeik95h46AyKHQANML1W2+Rg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=gTHkn+Lu/SEYEYpzf7VspBcrByCX+JrNZjxL8vifs ys=; b=YMuqqy+lNgobl+GM7lSsbWmANXT9/KNB8+79PB7ivG+yjwGcNfflRmFlR YQfof/TI5DP1/kRO35CmBN3G+p2NgqywjOw9Rw6yiozTFA/N/od+tbnCY8lIxnAA 7Sf+Z+2CyoNrCYq/GxdyP8fXuV09ur8JEK5/yHdTsb78TYzhdrMM2VbPFaqDzLrb AaKgsakcCTbPTShSC7cmGqV11CTyoTSEOBryCcuU7vScPPsrck3dywvlJ9fEzzSr eW2NaRV9aL9chYCOK4KFco1N9SHD3hqP9k6Icz4pwBBkamMhEk0p15WtvFh3HWD/ 2FLOM6FhLSK01ooUj+pX2WhG+HUvQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrgeeggdduvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptgfghfggufffkfhfjgfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomhepufgruhhl ihhushgpofgvnhhkvghvihgtihhushcuoehsrghulhhiuhhsmhgvnhhkvghvihgtihhush esfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiueevheeghfefveei leehveeffedvfeeljeelvefgueefgfeugeekfeeuvdekvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsrghulhhiuhhsmhgvnhhkvghvihgt ihhushesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 03:54:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87czk5brgr.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19C63) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=sauliusmenkevicius@fastmail.com; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:20:46 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285781 Archived-At: I=E2=80=99ve just received a new Mac (arm64/M1) for myself so I can test if 2= 8 has it broken on macOS too. =E2=80=94Saulius Menkevi=C4=8Dius > Am 2022-02-02 um 10:30 schrieb Robert Pluim : >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >>=20 >>>>>> On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:52:18 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said= : >=20 >>> From: Robert Pluim >>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Matt Armstrong , >>> p.stephani2@gmail.com, alan@idiocy.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp,= >>> emacs-devel@gnu.org >>> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 20:23:23 +0100 >>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:30:18 +0200, Saulius Menkevicius said: >>>=20 > Saulius> Thanks Robert! > Saulius> I applied your patch and that has actually has fixed the issue= . So I > Saulius> suggest this patch be applied on master. >>>=20 >>> I can do that, if Eli/Lars agree. >=20 > Eli> Are there any downsides to the patch? If not, I see no reasons no= t to > Eli> install that. >=20 > Not as far as I can tell, but I shall test on a few more platforms > before pushing. >=20 >>> What should we do for emacs-28? >=20 > Eli> Nothing, because on emacs-28 we use posix_spawn only on macOS. >=20 > Right, I=CA=BCd missed that, master it is then. We could put it in 28.2, I= > guess, but I hadn't noticed any issues with subprocesses on emacs-28 > on macOS. >=20 > Robert > --=20