From: Steven Tamm <steventamm@mac.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: MacOSX installation suggestions.
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:21:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7A846F7B-2147-11D7-91D4-00039390AB82@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E954245E-20A8-11D7-90FE-00039363E640@swipnet.se>
On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 04:26 AM, Jan D. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In the mac/INSTALL file it says twice that make install must be made as
> root. This is an error, I have never done make install as root, and
> if you just have write permission, this works fine (as it does with
> the other Emacs configurations). I dont think documentation casually
> should require you to be root to install things, when no such
> requirement exists. It discurages the installation of Emacs under
> your own user. I would change that to "make install requires that
> you have write permission in the destination directories" or something
> like that. Or not write anything at all.
It depends on the configuration. If the configuration is to place it
into /usr/local, then the correct permissions are there. However on my
machine, the non-root user doesn't have permission to write into
/usr/share, which would cause the installation to fail. Moreover,
installing into /usr is probably not the best idea because Apple's
system updates have a nasty habit of overwriting them (as it did
between 10.1 and 10.2).
The point is taken. I will point out that if installing into /usr (or
possibly some other directory), one might need to use sudo. I'll also
document the suggestion about not using /usr.
> I do think make install should install Emacs.app also. Now one has to
> manually copy it after make install. It doesn't seem right that make
> install doesn't install everything.
Makes sense. I just put in some changes to get the Application to
build in a separate directory, so having it install into /Application
would be nice (and pretty much done); it would make the make-package
script a little easier.
What do people think about placing this mac-specfic stuff in a new
Makefile in the mac/ directory v placing it in the src/ directory? I
was just going to place it in the src directory because it's not large
enough to justify all the configuration changes needed (unless there
are volunteers).
-Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-06 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-05 12:26 MacOSX installation suggestions Jan D.
2003-01-06 7:21 ` Steven Tamm [this message]
2003-01-06 11:07 ` Jan D.
2003-01-07 5:52 ` Steven Tamm
2003-01-07 17:54 ` Jan D.
2003-01-06 21:51 ` Andrew Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7A846F7B-2147-11D7-91D4-00039390AB82@mac.com \
--to=steventamm@mac.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).