From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 05:14:58 +0300 Message-ID: <797e7419-c526-3f90-011c-1bef32051172@yandex.ru> References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <7dd69fe5-4ef4-782c-2fba-031d475f6406@yandex.ru> <32fb4915-be55-f753-5f6c-423a09030fd6@gmx.at> <8b252ea4-5902-d21e-a0d7-cdb3ddbb4e08@yandex.ru> <39d47d8c.4bad.16fcd672191.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <729d39eb-d0b4-2cc5-cac3-e129a3effa87@yandex.ru> <06c6b6fb-ce6f-456b-6a22-c5a26a0ab297@gmx.at> <50912835-37d2-f15b-8fd1-b6619893d1ce@yandex.ru> <4a424bf3-ee08-b114-73ef-287bde14003b@gmx.at> <05459ded-2ee2-73b3-0c2b-62febcf0d356@gmx.at> <5686da19-24a4-0401-7a00-a41fab02b920@yandex.ru> <5f31adb8-f0ee-a253-0b3c-f60385c56699@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="51935"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: martin rudalics , tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 30 03:15:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwzMp-000DSx-PM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 03:15:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54932 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwzMo-00034E-PV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:15:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwzME-0002ct-Nj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwzMD-0004Fv-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::134]:36795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwzMD-0004Eu-Lp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id f24so1175598lfh.3 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:15:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jLGaMXYOQmHJOIw+eZm9fP35hCToAEQL18umTHfY7jo=; b=DVb23dK4IoEH2FA/OCESqYhfDh/ayGvB6DZPM3O8mDkFfxaGPyZnQM6pkSI7LJ3P8I CDAS0uo+2ADqUMD7jNkFlTJudF6omVizwydSOifL30ENjtbOomTovSwWbuShCkIQ8hn4 nS266fzRaTP6mfxeMGEdDdgZMMY/Z9kN5WeVO4p8fIks5H3X5ENaKni04JBMZYwqP4LN zXavLXttgyBkCFtCyv3OmVI+062fF2m6IucRaRm4sVZGUvbj67LUI978FUMgtClx9H/0 Oyuus2CrxkEhbHwMRCDGhWXHVAyQ34CROzy0GDgtmZOuStlq8w7HpPFsk91gc69rxHWh tbrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jLGaMXYOQmHJOIw+eZm9fP35hCToAEQL18umTHfY7jo=; b=hlDz4rJA1w1/rWOfyV6RZ+lqbnn4fskLe99zGpCF9LrpVjw+K+t35mC9x9uB/kWej6 ffYDJDXoe9MIhctpJACkNjLHTNQ/qEZZES6VcZvCgnf1B6UrEkzFkS6xSj0l+Q6fH9PF +fzX5ZOAvYGxLFbzichRL+z3/vYggRy8dtOTQI0AMlfPGgjA2SJFZ80M0WaRkvZxNB9H 0qk334mQOEWg9Gj8dC7p4FTAeN3omHGonQtSzlgPphW0aQALfPQK/Yugdawy0tkIQIuu nmKQZEHtT+eqMByaWe106bqhfht9HjPRVlKxmXLTWF68lIzVToFyS85fRlR6Ts8dW7+H pJ6w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVKE86ZP+sj/xF9aL6t9rv8GCLc5PE+HfbFIxDqCOmnMLDEhSnR kFwBoOax2Nz6CIWbN7H2QDk8FX4NReo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwOdPCbIgC/a3phIF2LZBWyCeawSC30SXwHt55jAnrKEVaUrKKnCDD1A0Vk8eGc6NcK4ri3HQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:6b11:: with SMTP id d17mr1219430lfa.168.1580350499756; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:14:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l28sm1902164lfk.21.2020.01.29.18.14.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:14:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5f31adb8-f0ee-a253-0b3c-f60385c56699@gmx.at> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::134 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244762 Archived-At: On 28.01.2020 19:20, martin rudalics wrote: > We have miscommunicated here: First I wrote that resizing is "much better > than moving" (because dragging a border is resizing) and you apparently > agreed with "Yes. I described that later in the previous email.".  Then > I meant that "Moving a frame is a no-brainer" and you responded with > "Resizing the frame.". Sorry if it was unclear. "Yes" was my answer to "Dragging the right and bottom borders too?", the question which started your paragraph that ended with "But it's much better than moving". > Either way, both resizing and moving are broken. Apparently so. Though only some of this breakage is relevant to child frames, I think.