From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some experience with the igc branch Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 23:55:19 -0800 Message-ID: <78f2a830-72f7-4bd7-bf47-d71c67264e62@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87o713wwsi.fsf@telefonica.net> <86o7112rnq.fsf@gnu.org> <867c7p2nz4.fsf@gnu.org> <861pxx2lh7.fsf@gnu.org> <86ldw40xbo.fsf@gnu.org> <86a5cj2a0e.fsf@gnu.org> <867c7n28sf.fsf@gnu.org> <877c7n962e.fsf@gmail.com> <8634ib24gp.fsf@gnu.org> <875xn75w7u.fsf@gmail.com> <86ttaryn1x.fsf@gnu.org> <877c7mzxbw.fsf@gmail.com> <861pxuzt61.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmfmy6mq.fsf@gmail.com> <86ttaqxybk.fsf@gnu.org> <867c7ly2v8.fsf@gnu.org> <86v7v4ut8w.fsf@gnu.org> <86seq7qbvu.fsf@gnu.org> <108c9575-f07b-41af-9626-3622d16e4cf5@cs.ucla.edu> <86r05qpa7e.fsf@gnu.org> <3056b6f4-1986-4fb2-b961-aa371e6016b3@cs.ucla.edu> <86o70up8b3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15331"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 30 08:55:57 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tSAd2-0003oK-E2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:55:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSAcb-00077E-Nq; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:55:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSAcY-00076x-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:55:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSAcW-0008LG-Fh; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:55:26 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26F63C123844; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 23:55:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP id fmOg6dqcZpZT; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 23:55:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CE63C123848; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 23:55:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 56CE63C123848 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu; s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1735545320; bh=BPo/Im9IOR7vq6UwlYuRA34eWkGjxXQQeh1xa4RSo7U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=B7UOjK6Udyd8wEvXgP0NznKyExJFwQGJ7FJImLNZ/yNLCJCJr1boSn52erVSDCoMe +iX+e3+9/lZlrxqxMMF4GY/rZWp2bW52Opnivj7UEJsKE+vYKRIT5EiiWjyCanj95h m8WPOWSJsng0Tro/I+L2zlRy7ipuXhTYaLm3myHStYqsw8/e4htSX37po+IcL0H7R2 NyKK9C1U3Pks+GOm2uOfzEpmXO8Od4SQ5it8Z0BqiDGAcfIOnUZpyaaM+5QXBhAcmy fhq1MkswHQzvkMf+s3kuSZLPcEfYumzH03cE3LZgtSrbTNFOtGrY/+veLAaDagk4P1 15goENPlqQ3SA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id pqNZ3n8ctTkV; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 23:55:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.86.40] (unknown [47.154.28.214]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AB8B3C123844; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 23:55:20 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86o70up8b3.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=131.179.128.66; envelope-from=eggert@cs.ucla.edu; helo=mail.cs.ucla.edu X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327392 Archived-At: On 12/29/24 12:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If the signal handler gets invoked and does its thing, how can that be > considered as "effectively ignoring" the signal? I get the feeling we're going around in circles, so I'll bow out and break the cycle.