From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Major update just committed Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 18:51:55 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7704-Sun01Jun2003185155+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <20030529190715.40E0.LEKTU@terra.es> <20030530092229.81D3.JMBARRANQUERO@laley.wke.es> <200305312033.h4VKXbcJ000827@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054484374 9588 80.91.224.249 (1 Jun 2003 16:19:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jmbarranquero@laley.wke.es Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 18:19:32 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19MVYS-0002UT-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 18:19:32 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19MVoe-00042i-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 18:36:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19MVaH-0001rH-B3 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:21:25 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19MVYx-0001Zy-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19MVT7-0006ms-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from frigg.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.16]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19MV7V-00005i-6N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 11:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretsky (tony08-233-35.inter.net.il [80.230.233.35] (may be forged)) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id CLJ08311; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 18:51:05 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <200305312033.h4VKXbcJ000827@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14564 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14564 > From: "Stefan Monnier" > Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:33:37 -0400 > > If we have another branch (other than unicode) for major changes, > then we will not really focus on the trunk, methinks. I agree that this danger would become very real. > So I think we should do like we did for 21.1 and like most projects > do AFAIK, which is to say "freeze", spend some months debugging > and then (and only then) make a new branch (which is the release branch). Agreed: feature-freeze of the next release should be something we do soon.