From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabulated list recenter issue Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:13:20 -0400 Message-ID: <76d1796f-e6ca-c208-c440-989df5b737d5@gmail.com> References: <87h93dogki.fsf@escafil> <87mvbm30lc.fsf@escafil> <83o9w2jh6m.fsf@gnu.org> <75f53b81-cee5-db91-3eee-3819b120ad28@gmail.com> <83lgr6jdui.fsf@gnu.org> <83efwxkd6t.fsf@gnu.org> <162c61b1-7517-761a-e00b-d1e3f75118c4@gmail.com> <83a87lk9ez.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492010163 26960 195.159.176.226 (12 Apr 2017 15:16:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:16:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cc: dunni@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 17:15:59 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cyJzz-0006tO-AO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:15:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44801 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyK05-00068M-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyJzs-00066W-Lw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyJzp-0000RQ-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:15:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]:33359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyJzp-0000R9-BF; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:15:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id k87so28767781ioi.0; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EWfOKa4ERsjLyejoe0s+tqWCRFi6LhjuuvPPGjjk1BY=; b=kqarHAvp/MMUIzQrhHHSDN3CyrnuYr5GA3JsOT1mfWZMIbCLHMc8pVVzT0miYQ68qA lZhnFVLG/b0j9cd5BZZhNTT2CdGNRgDm3qg0wrJU/Urjw38AurWbDZIrReCHqx3HidF/ UW01IXkUD+baEbHe2G6GKFfhNtuMFmXO5VvrzgmU4KTpb8RLpZBjwMGbRVbkPsBPbqfz 8QFGteOvymJCUsfWahNkKlDXjmXGpxAzP5HASfFRBC7hWvcoJsvIhb/Dk7XcaTl+y/+h YuF0V4LlDE8/J3/RiSryPwTS7R0506OyAXuipowEhaWewx1ATDnIDdN6/iiVP9HXfkJr 9O4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EWfOKa4ERsjLyejoe0s+tqWCRFi6LhjuuvPPGjjk1BY=; b=CxkZMeoQr6TATyJqQYCAJIkxAmSs3TumNdph9vpe3KaM8/HpIt+YLYLUGGyahJo4X9 tI1xI3qm4yxMtrO3xmiHCKLXwJGN+yLAvqZLRxcAb+2ET2qOeDEKTDTyNh2TgLTgHBs1 Td23j7y6r2pgq5ysWdE4Le3d4sWW8IBo6+LcCH0Hp8dSv4Dv1r+iEcWdir0vdaUyUxwW VzEsIKtt7ey5XaGFzw+VnYwuF+Dk6x6VAKrYHHEurG4cOdY3c8ip6RLtx9bZKZleljQC 9E2ix3Bo0+xP2b4eIEglYfgqWu25c+HF2BQcEmSWc2wMgoF8l0dYxEKFgJzzwy8CZb/f 3+Ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7pwrgL8uSLq3pgdyBE4+YdIFRbXPr7vIrc7kDL2U+S9KRg0gkveZT2PWBdRggYYA== X-Received: by 10.107.136.14 with SMTP id k14mr4111453iod.89.1492010130518; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [18.26.2.123] (26-2-123.dynamic.csail.mit.edu. [18.26.2.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a68sm2530733itd.30.2017.04.12.08.15.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:15:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83a87lk9ez.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213916 Archived-At: On 2017-04-12 10:06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Clément Pit-Claudel >> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:11:28 -0400 >> Cc: dunni@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On 2017-04-12 08:44, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> Cc: dunni@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >>>> From: Clément Pit-Claudel >>>> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:28:40 -0400 >>>> >>>>> IOW, I personally like the current behavior a lot. Of course, all of >>>>> my use cases are with lists longer than a single window. >>>> >>>> Wait, but in the very large majority of these cases the patch won't change anything, will it? The only case in which it changes things is when sorting puts your current entry towards the bottom of the list. >>> >>> Yes. But I also like it when I'm in the last window-full of text. >> >> Got it, thanks. > > Btw, in addition to what I proposed, I'm also okay with changing the > default behavior globally, as long as there's an option to get the old > behavior back. The current behavior exists for the last 6 years, so > if we change it, there should be a way to get it back if someone wants > or needs that. Great, thanks Eli! This makes complete sense.