From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 19:50:59 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <7680-Sat01Jun2002195058+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <87u1oo6xhm.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
 <8962-Fri31May2002214124+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
 <87elfs6spr.fsf@wesley.springies.com>
 <7999-Sat01Jun2002102420+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> 
 <878z5zvtlf.fsf@wesley.springies.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022950477 25793 127.0.0.1 (1 Jun 2002 16:54:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 16:54:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17EC9F-0006hu-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 18:54:37 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17ECRo-0005jb-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 19:13:48 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17EC8g-0008PF-00; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 12:54:02 -0400
Original-Received: from diana.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.19])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17EC6l-0008Fp-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 12:52:04 -0400
Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by diana.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA)
	with ESMTP id ADK25939;
	Sat, 1 Jun 2002 19:51:49 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: ats@acm.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <878z5zvtlf.fsf@wesley.springies.com> (message from Alan Shutko
	on Sat, 01 Jun 2002 12:42:20 -0400)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4541
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4541

> Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 12:42:20 -0400
> From: Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org>
> 
> I'm afraid I don't know how this section works, just that if you
> recompile Emacs without X but use the DOC from the X version, the
> messages are garbled.

That's a clear sign of a bug, IMHO.  src/Makefile.in is supposed to be
set up so that all versions of Emacs get the same functions
documented.  That's why ${docdir} is not architecture dependent.