From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:04:19 -0400 Message-ID: <764D32CF-D53F-496B-B1CF-6454EB245257@gnu.org> References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <16F5541A-23E7-473C-A4D5-61E3B6930526@raeburn.org> <85ejzihcet.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146179136 30241 80.91.229.2 (27 Apr 2006 23:05:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 01:05:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZFXx-00067x-CZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:05:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZFXv-0007Q2-TD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:05:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZFXh-0007Ot-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZFXf-0007MJ-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZFXe-0007LO-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.148.227.153] (helo=rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZFa5-0007SO-PW; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:07:29 -0400 Original-Received: from raeburn.org (c-65-96-168-237.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[65.96.168.237]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060427230421m13000lh6fe>; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:04:22 +0000 Original-Received: from [18.18.1.160] (NOME-KING.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.160]) by raeburn.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3RN4KMx003910; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:04:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <85ejzihcet.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Original-To: David Kastrup X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53529 Archived-At: On Apr 27, 2006, at 18:38, David Kastrup wrote: > Not necessarily. Most filenames are written to accommodate 8+3. so if > we have 12345678.el\0, this is twelve bytes. The same with .elc might > require sixteen bytes after alignment. I don't think that should be varying between compilers though. Unless the x86_64 ABI (implementation) isn't stable yet, which would be bad news... Ken