From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29) Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:19:17 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <75530e75-7686-ca2e-1951-96eb6d3d2355@cs.ucla.edu> References: <1697CA97-B2E6-4202-B14D-99DCF93954FD@acm.org> <02405f0d-788f-1b87-0269-b06eb2d67ff8@cs.ucla.edu> <83zhif4nq6.fsf@gnu.org> <6cf4485e-3d94-ce92-6342-d83cdc7f95d7@cs.ucla.edu> <83k19j4fw3.fsf@gnu.org> <2831f530-b702-50e0-e494-8620d5a0fdb5@cs.ucla.edu> <83muef2dmj.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftk53i74.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8yt1zap.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="150407"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 06 21:20:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHC4Y-000d0b-Pi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:20:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36526 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHC4X-0007Gg-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:20:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHC45-0007Ga-4I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHC44-0000m6-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:37478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHC3t-0000h1-FD; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:19:23 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D07160228; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id D8D1P7AYDJP6; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA58160263; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id LaEMl4Jq51EO; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C0A9160228; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83o8yt1zap.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240668 Archived-At: On 10/6/19 11:53 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Was it (a) or (b), according to your interpretation? Partly (a) and partly (b). Really, it doesn't matter. > we will keep > bumping at this and arguing about such changes in the future. I'm not arguing about the change now. As I said, please feel free to revert whatever part of it that you dislike (though I suggest keeping the bug fixes). I don't think unimportant little cases like this are worth either your time or mine (though perhaps we'll have to disagree about that as well :-).