From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:45:51 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7494-Fri17Oct2003084551+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <200310121947.h9CJlhKH006102@oak.pohoyda.family> <7137-Thu16Oct2003085921+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066373516 21678 80.91.224.253 (17 Oct 2003 06:51:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 17 08:51:54 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AAOSo-0007Q8-00 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:51:54 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AAOSn-0007kn-00 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:51:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AAOSG-0002qV-8F for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 02:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AAORs-0002qK-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 02:50:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AAORM-0002gL-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 02:50:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AAORL-0002g0-S5; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 02:50:24 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.102]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id BQX73952; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:50:20 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:06:49 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17199 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17199 > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:06:49 -0400 > > > When we convert the email to babyl format, > > Paul Riley and I have made a version of Rmail that doesn't use Babyl > format. We want to get rid of it entirely. I think it is currently > available in a branch called rmail-mbox-branch. > > So please don't think in terms of conversion to Babyl > format when designing future Rmail changes. There still is a phase where the messages are processed for display, right? At the very least, the modified RMAIL should find the boundaries of each message and narrow the buffer to those boundaries, right? That's the phase I was referring to, the "conversion to Babyl" is just a convenient name for it, nothing more.