From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate? Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:48:11 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <7458-Tue13Aug2002124811+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <87bs8f8dh7.fsf@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> <20020808.102316.91281422.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <9743-Sun11Aug2002164949+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20020812.111931.12333219.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029232248 14399 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2002 09:50:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jpw@shootybangbang.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17eYK7-0003k8-00 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:50:47 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17eYia-00006r-00 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:16:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17eYKW-0006Y8-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:51:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17eYKE-0006Wq-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17eYK8-0006WW-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from odin.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17eYK7-0006WP-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id ALE55598; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:50:38 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: <20020812.111931.12333219.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> (message from Tak Ota on Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6500 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6500 > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT) > From: Tak Ota > > > > In other words, the mere fact of cygwin.dll's existence does not > > necessarily mean that this Emacs is a Cygwin binary. > > You are right. For that purpose I think `system-type' should provide > appropriate distinction between the two. Yes, that would be my recommendation as well.