From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bidi Subject: Re: merge emacs-bidi into the main tree Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:56:46 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7458-Sun10Aug2003185645+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <87lluax3ch.fsf@emacswiki.org> <7458-Sun03Aug2003224354+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <87smoi9p64.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87he4x5v7x.fsf_-_@emacswiki.org> <86brv0wfyn.fsf@gerd.free-bsd.org> <6480-Fri08Aug2003180204+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <8665l886vu.fsf@gerd.free-bsd.org> <86y8y1yesi.fsf@gerd.free-bsd.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1060531616 5335 80.91.224.253 (10 Aug 2003 16:06:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-bidi@gnu.org, alex@emacswiki.org, developer@arabeyes.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 10 18:06:54 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19lsic-0004lZ-00 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:06:54 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19lspU-0001Iy-00 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:14:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19lsfx-0000vY-KE for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19lsdv-0000FQ-Ax for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19lsck-0007iM-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19lscj-0007cT-0Q; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:00:49 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (pns03-199-55.inter.net.il [80.230.199.55]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id BEW59210; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:00:38 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: gerd.moellmann@t-online.de X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <86y8y1yesi.fsf@gerd.free-bsd.org> (gerd.moellmann@t-online.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15867 gmane.emacs.bidi:134 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15867 > From: gerd.moellmann@t-online.de (Gerd Moellmann) > Date: 10 Aug 2003 12:42:37 +0200 > > (Which is, BTW, where my intuition comes from, only that I didn't > disable any optimizations, but implement one after the other until the > result was "fast enough", for me anyway. Just so we have a reference: what kind of a machine did you use at the time you did that? > In any case, I think it might be worth the experiment. Computers got > noticeable faster, maybe the picture is different now than it was in > the late '90s. True. Btw--and this is just for completeness' sake--one of the design goals of what I've written was to allow the reordering code to be called from a variety of places, like if we need to encode text in visual order so it could be sent to a printer.