From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:57:38 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <7458-Sun01Sep2002195738+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020901150036.28825A-100000@is> <m3sn0tkemo.fsf@Janik.cz>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030899448 6103 127.0.0.1 (1 Sep 2002 16:57:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:57:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: huug.at.gmane@xs4all.nl, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17lY2Q-0001aF-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 18:57:26 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17lYaF-0003Tk-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:32:23 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17lY3v-00062l-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:58:59 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17lY1T-0005eC-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:56:27 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17lY1M-0005Xt-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:56:26 -0400
Original-Received: from diana.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.19])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17lY1M-0005Xi-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:56:20 -0400
Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by diana.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA)
	with ESMTP id AJV56344;
	Sun, 1 Sep 2002 19:55:44 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: Pavel@Janik.cz
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <m3sn0tkemo.fsf@Janik.cz> (Pavel@Janik.cz)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7276
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7276

> From: Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?=)
> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 15:45:19 +0200
> 
> I think that Emacs does almost the right thing with f1. The question is
> whether it could do a better job. What about opening Help menu? Do you
> think it could be better for users who are used to get help by f1?

I think there's a rule that a command that was invoked by a keyboard
key does not open the menu bar.  So what Emacs does looks consistent
to me.