From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 20:20:07 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <7458-Fri05Jul2002202007+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <200207041637.g64Gbpx25663@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025889715 12129 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2002 17:21:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 17:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17QWmJ-00039W-00 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:21:55 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17QWst-0004iX-00 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:28:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QWlW-0008JF-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 13:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from diana.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.19]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QWkh-0008Hq-00 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 13:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by diana.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id AFP82643; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 20:20:07 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: jcast@ou.edu X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: <200207041637.g64Gbpx25663@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> (message from Jon Cast on Thu, 04 Jul 2002 11:37:51 -0500) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5518 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5518 > Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 11:37:51 -0500 > From: Jon Cast > > OK, I (obviously) didn't know about the output format additions. I > retract my statements about Texinfo. Sorry if I offended you. I didn't take any offence, don't worry about that. > However, reading the Texinfo NEWS file has produced another idea why > it doesn't get as many complaints: 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 all have NEWS > entries beginning `new ...'. That leads me to suspect Texinfo doesn't > have bug-fix releases Version 4.2 was a bugfix release, but it also added one significant new feature (the @copying command).