From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: leim build bug
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:23:27 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <7263-Sat26Oct2002102327+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <E1854DX-0006GK-00@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> <200210251333.WAA20177@etlken.m17n.org> <E1854fY-0007Ek-00@pot.cnuce.cnr.it>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035620573 26428 80.91.224.249 (26 Oct 2002 08:22:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:22:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185MDb-0006s0-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:22:51 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 185MGf-0003D7-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:26:01 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185MCz-0001lT-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:22:13 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185MCY-0001JS-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:21:46 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185MCW-0001Hn-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:21:46 -0400
Original-Received: from diana.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.19])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185MCW-0001F4-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:21:44 -0400
Original-Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.194.241])
	by diana.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA)
	with ESMTP id AOL13741;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:21:40 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: pot@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <E1854fY-0007Ek-00@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> (message from Francesco
	Potorti` on Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:38:32 +0200)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8799
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8799

> From: Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:38:32 +0200
> 
> > you suggest that we must modify the current code so that
> > untaring leim first also works well?
> 
> Sure.  Or else put something in the makefile that warns that you have
> untarred in the wrong order and the installation will not work well.
> But it should work either way.
> 
> I'll do the pretest anyway, but I think that this should be straightened
> out before publishing 21.3.

I disagree.  What you found out was unchanged since Emacs 20.1, and I
don't think I've ever heard any complaints.  The file INSTALL says:

    You should unpack leim-M.N.tar.gz into the same directory where you
    have previously unpacked the main Emacs distribution.  It fills in the
    contents of one subdirectory, which is present in the main Emacs
    distribution only in dummy form.

Since The HEAD version makes Leim part of the Emacs distribution, I
don't recommend changing this aspect for the branch version.