From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: ChangeLog and unification Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 10:02:11 +0200 Message-ID: <7263-Sat16Feb2002100210+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013847516 22390 195.204.10.66 (16 Feb 2002 08:18:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Feb 2002 08:18:36 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16c03I-0005p2-00 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:18:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bzrG-0006Rx-00; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 03:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from freya.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.14]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bzov-0006Ol-00 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 03:03:45 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretsky (diup-219-63.inter.net.il [213.8.219.63]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BFJ02606; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 10:03:40 +0200 (IST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1196 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1196 Would people who use unify-on-en/decode please take care not to recode Latin-n characters, for n != 2, as a side effect of committing changes in ChangeLog files? Apart of changing some people's names, it also greatly bloats the messages sent to the emacs-diffs mailing list. If there's no reasonable way to avoid this with local customizations, let's design and implement a feature that will allow to do that. (Such a feature seems to be a good idea in general, even for the Unicode Emacs, since we are going to enter a transitional period where some people use unifications, while others don't. We should find a way these two camps could peacefully coexist ;-) _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel