From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mysterious redisplay problem and a trap in xdisp.c Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 09:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: <7263-Sat09Feb2002092535+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <20020207125930.847AA7C035@mail.filanet.dk> <5xheoraead.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013240668 29522 195.204.10.66 (9 Feb 2002 07:44:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Feb 2002 07:44:28 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16ZSBP-0007g4-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 08:44:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16ZRxb-0000WE-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 02:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from thor.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.11]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16ZRue-0000RL-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 02:27:09 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretsky (diup-220-84.inter.net.il [213.8.220.84]) by thor.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AGD93572; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 09:26:48 +0200 (IST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <5xheoraead.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:907 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:907 > From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) > Date: 08 Feb 2002 21:50:50 +0100 > > But it is never(?) called when I turn off the tool-bar (except if I > make an explicit M-x garbage-collect) But maybe that is because using > the tool-bar causes the automatic garbage collection to happen more > frequently. You could verify this by setting gc-cons-threshold to a small value. > I have tried hard to understand what's going on, but maybe someone > else is able to see what might be wrong here... I suggest to CC Gerd Moellmann with this discussion (and forward him the previous messages with important findings). _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel