From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 27.1 released Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:50:33 +0200 Message-ID: <7248DF65-C427-4D10-AD48-3240B3EF66A7@acm.org> References: <87a6z2ds3y.fsf@petton.fr> <834kp9ox92.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft8smgje.fsf@gmx.de> <83k0y4ndwz.fsf@gnu.org> <83bljfolp8.fsf@gnu.org> <01498CD4-5E25-4785-941C-D6E9A100ED7F@acm.org> <837du3oh2w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mjn00q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3267"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 13 21:51:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6JGF-0000kp-Ie for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:51:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42498 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6JGE-0001tm-JO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:51:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6JFM-0000lj-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:50:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1463c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.63]:46914 helo=mail268c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6JFJ-0001JY-Nq; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:50:43 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1597348235; bh=04703jBpTiUqxS5YPHbMGWioNKw0kGTEF2xPzlZFW4k=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=pqZ6PseblUdPzWTQQcUGVjzlkDg6TSZZcLIr6gxqDpH37WZAWGw0NWUtYg4AXTpD9 j3bxkNUacKL9ar5IRyLYBiOcklD1hfdKxF5/SIOF/b4aLQBG4ZYce7VJkm5aPYlGUu 8G0nzXZ33mPElgSQMeV6UEeZXKe1vXBk355z8I+o= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c188-150-171-71.bredband.comhem.se [188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail268c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 07DJoXAf026781; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:50:35 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83y2mjn00q.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F24.5F35998B.0035, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=BZ+mLYl2 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=PcFn2-s0reCm5CW8xUkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.14.63; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail268c50.megamailservers.eu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/13 15:50:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253748 Archived-At: 12 aug. 2020 kl. 21.21 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > I just counted its callers, that's all. A change in a function that > has many callers could have unintended consequences beyond the > function itself. I'm very happy that you are taking an interest in Calc again, and = especially that you took the trouble of digging into the ramifications = of this little correction! I'm most curious to hear what you found out. = You see, when the change to calcFunc-gcd was made, naturally I did look = at its callers carefully to assess the impact. Now since you brought it = up I've done so again, and found nothing new: all users of that function = are either indifferent to the change, or actively benefit from it. It seems clear that the code is less buggy now than before the change = and should therefore be preferred for the sake of correctness. However, = I could be wrong, and would very much benefit from your findings so that = my mistakes can be fixed on master!