From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: On language-dependent defaults for character-folding Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:22:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <71d3b485-6f4e-4291-a0db-b5efa68700d3@default> References: < <87egc7evu3.fsf@gnus.org> <<83io1jpt4u.fsf@gnu.org> <87povqhj25.fsf@gnus.org> <87povqe5tr.fsf@gnus.org> <87ziuta4l4.fsf@gnus.org> <87y4adzcia.fsf@gnus.org> < <83twl0k1k5.fsf@gnu.org> < <83k2lvi99c.fsf@gnu.org> < <83oab6gfiw.fsf@gnu.org> < <878u29x8vl.fsf@fastmail.fm> < <83ziuncpch.fsf@gnu.org> < <83fuwecztu.fsf@gnu.org> < <83d1rhc48o.fsf@gnu.org> < <<83oab0ako0.fsf@gnu.org> <56D33590.6050004@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456683786 27353 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2016 18:23:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:23:06 +0000 (UTC) To: =?iso-8859-1?B?Q2zpbWVudCBQaXQtLUNsYXVkZWw=?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 28 19:22:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aa5zY-0000hw-OY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:22:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa5zX-0003WD-U6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:22:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa5zK-0003W4-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:22:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa5zH-0001t8-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:22:38 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:27113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa5zH-0001t3-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:22:35 -0500 Original-Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u1SIMWn2027922 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:22:33 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u1SIMVbx010555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:22:32 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u1SIMVXt018437; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:22:31 GMT In-Reply-To: <56D33590.6050004@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200777 Archived-At: > >>> For the release, I think we should turn it off by default > >>> and invite people to try turning it on. > >> > >> That would be a grave mistake, IMO, since at least some parts of > >> folding are a must, and no one objected to them till now (neither > >> would I expect to see any objections). See my other message for > >> details. > > > > Some parts are a must? Which parts, and a must for what? > > A must for the _default_ behavior? >=20 > I guess Eli had pairs such as .../. in mind; I have not any > disagreement about them. Why would such pairs be a "must" in terms of the default behavior?