From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>,
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>,
Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: RE: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding.
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:32:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <718e93ef-f2a7-4272-9bd9-31b482409bc8@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8rc2w6p.fsf@web.de>
> Since RESULT is deprecated anyway, and there were no strong opinions
> against that, I would like to turn that warning into a warning that
> always happens when you use RESULT saying "warning: argument RESULT in
> dotimes is deprecated" or so.
Why was RESULT deprecated?
RESULT is good enough for Common Lisp. Why isn't
it good enough for Elisp? Just curious.
http://clhs.lisp.se/Body/m_dotime.htm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200419004503.26161.91884@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <20200419004504.C65772049B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2020-04-19 6:18 ` master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding Juanma Barranquero
2020-04-20 5:10 ` Stefan Kangas
2020-04-20 5:34 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-20 11:06 ` Noam Postavsky
2020-04-20 13:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-20 14:55 ` Drew Adams
2020-04-20 16:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-28 2:14 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-28 2:59 ` Strange compiler warning in `dotimes' (was: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding.) Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-28 15:32 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2020-04-29 0:53 ` master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-29 0:59 ` Drew Adams
2020-04-29 1:13 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-29 1:23 ` Drew Adams
2020-04-29 2:31 ` Vladimir Sedach
2020-04-29 3:58 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-29 4:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-29 18:33 ` Vladimir Sedach
2020-04-29 4:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-29 15:05 ` Noam Postavsky
2020-04-30 2:26 ` Richard Stallman
2020-05-16 3:21 ` Michael Heerdegen
2020-04-29 3:53 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=718e93ef-f2a7-4272-9bd9-31b482409bc8@default \
--to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=stefankangas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).