install error on Mac OS X

install error on Mac OS X

[Edward O'Connor]

Hi,

'make install' on OS X isn't copying much of anything into
/usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.90:

,----[ ls -lR /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.90 ]
| total 0
| drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel   68 Oct 31 10:55 etc/
| drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel   68 Oct 31 10:55 leim/
| drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel   68 Oct 31 10:55 lisp/
| drwxr-xr-x   3 root  wheel  102 Oct 31 10:55 site-lisp/
| 
| /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.90/etc:
| 
| /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.90/leim:
| 
| /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.90/lisp:
| 
| /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.90/site-lisp:
| total 8
| -rw-r--r--   1 root  wheel  106 Oct 31 10:55 subdirs.el
`----

This makes the installed Emacs binary somewhat less useful. :(

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Kazu Yamamoto]

> 'make install' on OS X isn't copying much of anything into
> /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.90:

First of all, Emacs should be installed in /Application in MacOS.

The following sequence works with CVS Head.

% ./configure --enable-carbon-app=/Applications --without-x --prefix=/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources
% make
% sudo make install

--Kazu

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Edward O'Connor]

> First of all, Emacs should be installed in /Application in MacOS.
>
> The following sequence works with CVS Head.
>
> % ./configure --enable-carbon-app=/Applications --without-x
> 	--prefix=/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources
> % make
> % sudo make install

Ahh. Hmm. When did this change? I've been doing the following, and it's
worked for a long time:

% ./configure --enable-carbon-app --without-x
% make
% sudo make install


Ted

-- 
Edward O'Connor
hober0@gmail.com

Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Richard Stallman]

    % ./configure --enable-carbon-app=/Applications --without-x --prefix=/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources
    % make
    % sudo make install

If those args to ./configure are necessary,
should Emacs be changed so that it works ok
without those arguments?

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Randal L. Schwartz]

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

Richard>     % ./configure --enable-carbon-app=/Applications --without-x --prefix=/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources
Richard>     % make
Richard>     % sudo make install

Richard> If those args to ./configure are necessary,
Richard> should Emacs be changed so that it works ok
Richard> without those arguments?

My configure line is merely:

        ./configure --prefix=/opt/emacs --without-x

and it builds the Carbon version just fine, installing it into /opt/emacs.

It's not wise to overwrite the one in /Applications.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Seiji Zenitani]

Hello,

On 2006/11/02, at 8:37, Kazu Yamamoto wrote:
>
>     % ./configure --enable-carbon-app=/Applications --without-x -- 
> prefix=/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources
>     % make
>     % sudo make install
>
> If those args to ./configure are necessary,
> should Emacs be changed so that it works ok
> without those arguments?
>

Yamamoto-san's way is favorable because everything is enclosed in  
the /Application directory.

By the way, Mac users often move an Emacs icon (/Applications/ 
Emacs.app) to other place (/Somewhere/Else/Emacs.app). Therefore, it  
is much more favorable if emacs is independent of its prefix path.  
Take a look at the mac/make-package script in the emacs source code.  
The line

	./make-package --self-contained

will build a prefix-independent version of emacs, by re-arranging its  
internal directory structure. I recommend this 'self-contained' way  
rather than the above Yamamoto-san's way.

Also, for simplicity, I think 'mac/make-package' should be integrated  
into the configure script. How about removing 'mac/make-package' and  
then introducing a new configure option, something like './configure  
--self-contained'?


best regards,


Seiji Zenitani
zenitani@gmail.com

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Richard Stallman]

    My configure line is merely:

	    ./configure --prefix=/opt/emacs --without-x

Why is --without-x needed?
Should we make that automatic, for MacOS builds?

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Randal L. Schwartz]

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

Richard>     My configure line is merely:
Richard> 	    ./configure --prefix=/opt/emacs --without-x

Richard> Why is --without-x needed?
Richard> Should we make that automatic, for MacOS builds?

It may be leftover legacy.  I know I needed it early on to build a carbon app
instead of an x app.

It's probably good to bias the default as a carbon app, and then requrie an
explicit switch to make an X app.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu]

>>>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:52:46 -0500, Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com> said:

> I've been doing the following, and it's worked for a long time:

> % ./configure --enable-carbon-app --without-x
> % make
> % sudo make install

What did the last command say?

BTW, --without-x is no longer needed if either --enable-carbon-app or
--with-carbon is specified.

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu]

>>>>> On 03 Nov 2006 11:08:37 -0800, merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) said:

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
Richard> My configure line is merely: ./configure --prefix=/opt/emacs
Richard> --without-x

Richard> Why is --without-x needed?  Should we make that automatic,
Richard> for MacOS builds?

> It may be leftover legacy.  I know I needed it early on to build a
> carbon app instead of an x app.

> It's probably good to bias the default as a carbon app, and then
> requrie an explicit switch to make an X app.

Mac OS X does not install X11 by default.  And --without-x is not
necessary to build the Carbon version unless X11 was additionally
installed to the system.

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Randal L. Schwartz]

>>>>> "YAMAMOTO" == YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> writes:

>> It's probably good to bias the default as a carbon app, and then
>> requrie an explicit switch to make an X app.

YAMAMOTO> Mac OS X does not install X11 by default.  And --without-x is not
YAMAMOTO> necessary to build the Carbon version unless X11 was additionally
YAMAMOTO> installed to the system.

Well, that's the problem then.  Most systems *have* X11 installed,
in my experience.  But most systems will want Carbon, not X11 Emacs,
in my opinion.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Richard Stallman]

    It's probably good to bias the default as a carbon app, and then requrie an
    explicit switch to make an X app.

I would tend to agree.

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Richard Stallman]

    Mac OS X does not install X11 by default.  And --without-x is not
    necessary to build the Carbon version unless X11 was additionally
    installed to the system.

If the usual case on the Mac is to use Carbon and not X,
it seems to me that Emacs should ALWAYS use Carbon when built
in the default way.  To use X should require a specific option.

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu]

>>>>> On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:07:43 -0500, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> said:

> If the usual case on the Mac is to use Carbon and not X, it seems to
> me that Emacs should ALWAYS use Carbon when built in the default
> way.

I'm not sure which is the usual case.  Users of precompiled binary
packages might be dominant among the Carbon-version users.

> To use X should require a specific option.

What should we do for the case that --with-x-toolkit (or other
X-specific options) is specified without explicit --with-x or
--without-carbon?

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Richard Stallman]

    > To use X should require a specific option.

    What should we do for the case that --with-x-toolkit (or other
    X-specific options) is specified without explicit --with-x or
    --without-carbon?

It would make sense for --with-x-toolkit to imply --with-x.

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu]

>>>>> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:00:25 -0500, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> said:

>> To use X should require a specific option.
>     What should we do for the case that --with-x-toolkit (or other
>     X-specific options) is specified without explicit --with-x or
>     --without-carbon?

> It would make sense for --with-x-toolkit to imply --with-x.

Could anyone who is familiar with autoconf check the following patch?

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.416
diff -c -r1.416 configure.in
*** configure.in	4 Nov 2006 03:28:27 -0000	1.416
--- configure.in	7 Nov 2006 01:58:43 -0000
***************
*** 1779,1785 ****
  if test "${window_system}" = x11 && test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then
    if test "${with_carbon+set}" != set \
       && test "${carbon_appdir_x+set}" != set; then
!     HAVE_CARBON=no
    fi
  fi
  if test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then
--- 1779,1791 ----
  if test "${window_system}" = x11 && test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then
    if test "${with_carbon+set}" != set \
       && test "${carbon_appdir_x+set}" != set; then
!     for var in with_x with_x_toolkit with_gtk with_xim \
!                with_xpm with_jpeg with_tiff with_gif with_png; do
!       if test "`eval 'echo \"${'\"$var\"'+set}\"'`" = set; then
!         HAVE_CARBON=no
!         break
!       fi
!     done
    fi
  fi
  if test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Jan Djärv]

YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu skrev:
>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:00:25 -0500, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> said:
> 
>>> To use X should require a specific option.
>>     What should we do for the case that --with-x-toolkit (or other
>>     X-specific options) is specified without explicit --with-x or
>>     --without-carbon?
> 
>> It would make sense for --with-x-toolkit to imply --with-x.
> 
> Could anyone who is familiar with autoconf check the following patch?
> 
> 				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
> 				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp
> 
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.416
> diff -c -r1.416 configure.in
> *** configure.in	4 Nov 2006 03:28:27 -0000	1.416
> --- configure.in	7 Nov 2006 01:58:43 -0000
> ***************
> *** 1779,1785 ****
>   if test "${window_system}" = x11 && test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then
>     if test "${with_carbon+set}" != set \
>        && test "${carbon_appdir_x+set}" != set; then
> !     HAVE_CARBON=no
>     fi
>   fi
>   if test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then
> --- 1779,1791 ----
>   if test "${window_system}" = x11 && test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then
>     if test "${with_carbon+set}" != set \
>        && test "${carbon_appdir_x+set}" != set; then
> !     for var in with_x with_x_toolkit with_gtk with_xim \
> !                with_xpm with_jpeg with_tiff with_gif with_png; do
> !       if test "`eval 'echo \"${'\"$var\"'+set}\"'`" = set; then
> !         HAVE_CARBON=no
> !         break
> !       fi
> !     done
>     fi
>   fi
>   if test "${HAVE_CARBON}" = yes; then

For clarity, and to get rid of the backticks, I would write the for loop like 
this:

   for var in with_x with_x_toolkit with_gtk with_xim \
              with_xpm with_jpeg with_tiff with_gif with_png; do
      eval "x=\${$var+set}";
      if test "$x" = set; then
      ...

Other than that, it looks fine.

	Jan D.

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[Andreas Schwab]

Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> writes:

> For clarity, and to get rid of the backticks, I would write the for loop
> like this:
>
>   for var in with_x with_x_toolkit with_gtk with_xim \
>              with_xpm with_jpeg with_tiff with_gif with_png; do
>      eval "x=\${$var+set}";
>      if test "$x" = set; then

Or even this:

       if eval test \"\${$var+set}\" = set; then

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Re: install error on Mac OS X

[YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu]

>>>>> On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:55:49 +0100, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> said:

> Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> writes:
>> For clarity, and to get rid of the backticks, I would write the for loop
>> like this:
>> 
>> for var in with_x with_x_toolkit with_gtk with_xim \
>> with_xpm with_jpeg with_tiff with_gif with_png; do
>> eval "x=\${$var+set}";
>> if test "$x" = set; then

> Or even this:
>        if eval test \"\${$var+set}\" = set; then

Thanks for the comments.  They are much cleaner.

				     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
				mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp