From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: loaddefs.el and MH-E Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:06:20 -0700 Organization: Newt Software Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <7128.1093838780@newt.com> References: <01c48d2d$Blat.v2.2.2$6cfed020@zahav.net.il> <26280.1093804886@newt.com> <01c48e45$Blat.v2.2.2$6fd16ce0@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093838850 3302 80.91.224.253 (30 Aug 2004 04:07:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 04:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 06:07:22 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C1dRx-0008Qn-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:07:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1dWl-0000qR-JX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C1dWe-0000on-SN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:12:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C1dWd-0000oT-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:12:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1dWd-0000oJ-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [207.217.120.48] (helo=mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C1dRZ-0001Aa-LQ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:06:57 -0400 Original-Received: from h-68-166-38-222.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.166.38.222] helo=olgas.newt.com) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1C1dRZ-00005M-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:06:57 -0700 Original-Received: from wohler (helo=newt.com) by olgas.newt.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C1dQy-0001r0-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:06:20 -0700 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: "Eli Zaretskii"'s message of Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:56:12 +0300. <01c48e45$Blat.v2.2.2$6fd16ce0@zahav.net.il> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 21.3.1 X-Image-URL: http://www.newt.com/wohler/images/bill-diving.png X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26610 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26610 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:41:26 -0700 > > From: Bill Wohler > > > > The loaddefs.el definitions are the entry points into MH-E and these > > (few) definitions should be the only ones from MH-E loaded initially. > > Once MH-E is loaded, the definitions in mh-loaddefs.el are loaded for > > the support functions. The only trouble that it would cause to load the > > mh-loaddefs.el prematurely is to make it difficult for the new user to > > decide which of the hundreds of functions to choose. > > Sorry, for some reason it seemed to me that I saw the autoloads for > the same symbols in both of the files. That would not be intentional, but as long as the entry points weren't missing from loaddefs.el, I don't think it would do any harm to have duplicates in mh-loaddefs.el, would it? -- Bill Wohler http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.