From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:05:34 +0200 Message-ID: <70fd2374-23ea-1c03-a4e4-97a370a41acf@yandex.ru> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <87czwzfn9p.fsf@telefonica.net> <87eehfnd83.fsf@gnus.org> <1fb773f6-1480-53ce-08ae-1f7d0ba23428@yandex.ru> <87k0r637k4.fsf@gnus.org> <80e8c434-888d-23c5-13f0-c513bbf13ee4@yandex.ru> <8735xtznrh.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14081"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 14:06:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCj1C-0003Xw-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:06:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCj1B-0006SW-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCj03-0005lN-5x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:05:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]:39583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCizy-0003UU-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:05:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id t11so5404107ejx.6 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:05:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7eYpkqjX1czmCdwL0GEeBkObQZgTTLWdOXHI82Q2rfI=; b=knHVnlfDbnUAOA3DTGqJq7MpMgEkbI8Jz1iRX1Zv6hl+L7VO5WlNvibozIKbepFqXQ yaWf+59O6yijOckG0vmawkOT10MFOG04w+DPsFpfkUoZx9tssZQrrG3ApP2LY5pWs7Ze DtfgdNExFSJjO/d4YpqE69oVLnGQ2mvAfpBDeJw1I4HD8hP3J7Pply9XpjqB2Ldht/QP +Lbd14O9pvVJdV8KPaDFXW/q0g4mJjR/1T+Ql1MAPW71yCfJpE7+75wGURbwPm/W/IFY 5+LNyufjfAZ3Y6V0+9uuZ17FrB2m7vbzq7pjWDq2I8TM6wvdO0AWpDlOzi8GHLIL3DyC qUXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7eYpkqjX1czmCdwL0GEeBkObQZgTTLWdOXHI82Q2rfI=; b=SKQzaaRR+ndSEEVeGMoqVcLGbqpuVAmWoAnduwa/yXwBCPN1VCk+zbWyQwpU52YH9v no+b9BWrRqwvb+KWu/CCWWj+LmfI5mPiygcab3SZq13LCQCeiB0FvT5y4RU+gzvnRI3J 6xgo2aUh/6QbO4x02Thz9UhRCazviLMJGE7WMa7V0kMXXovxfghTJoGnVIp3VgGM7i99 IbLfFm4pd3EqAmS3+Xtdf6rKdbnx5Y2eWujHxCBYph3dtrB0RRDLKGyGNTvCGi8PTCdM tTz8I2s/vpCBJjhLUyf1LIk6Oqf8yftiieD0rw5+L9VFWiuQ4ef4BJHB/SCpro9bXOVp VvRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oiP79B2DF3S3+OOMN4+dwr98ypf4rvmfN7tYYDh4tV4G0t8ii jG//6v3LrH7QIab4EhhX/hoVF58oPbg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBABC8cz1LwXNXa4k0tMjytcplx60tUSljKweau2WjnDLC485VjM8MLbDgxakFQB1cZXKRFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:78d5:: with SMTP id kv21mr3888099ejc.461.1613653537410; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:05:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w24sm1959406edu.2.2021.02.18.05.05.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:05:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8735xtznrh.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62a; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265149 Archived-At: On 18.02.2021 12:14, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I guess the main performance difference is in loading the .elc files -- > parsing and applying all the `put's. Hm. Are you saying that the use of (declare (completion ...)) form currently requires us to parse all .elc files?